[lld] r227711 - [test] Add test for section groups and deadstrip
shankare at codeaurora.org
Fri Feb 6 07:07:21 PST 2015
On 2/6/2015 6:52 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> On 5 February 2015 at 19:12, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> You need to keep the group if you are referring to one function in the
>> group. Its a bug with gold/gnu if its throwing away the whole group.
> No, it is not.
> Please point to the part of the ELF spec that supports your statement.
The resolver regards the group as one unit and the garbage collection
should also treat them as one unit.
The message from Cary here has the snip.
Even better, to my mind, we could use (both COMDAT and non-COMDAT)
group sections to tie the code and debug info (and static data, and
eh_frame info, etc.) together into a single group. *Garbage collection**
**could then treat each such group as an atomic unit: any reference to a**
**group member section makes the whole group reachable*. Back when we
added COMDAT group sections to the ELF format, we had in mind
something like this, which is why each group section begins with a
flag word with GRP_COMDAT set to identify a COMDAT group.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits