[llvm] r225941 - X86: validate 'int' instruction

Joerg Sonnenberger joerg at britannica.bec.de
Fri Jan 16 06:09:51 PST 2015

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Rafael EspĂ­ndola wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 03:56, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree. I've wanted to start looking into this, but it gets into a little
> > trouble because the gnu assember throws a truncation warning instead of an
> > error on some cases. We don't have a great way to handle that in the MC
> > assembler framework.
> Do you know if that is a case where we need bug-by-bug compatibility with gas?

I can't think of a valid reason why you would like to depend on
truncation, but you can always add an explicit binary, can't you?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list