[PATCH] R600/SI: Fix sext_inreg problems

Matt Arsenault arsenm2 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 10:18:36 PST 2014


> On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:55 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:44:55PM -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>>>> On 11/07/2014 12:17 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> These fix terrible problems with sext_inreg for 64-bit types
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> <0001-R600-SI-Fix-sext_inreg-in-i64.patch><0002-R600-SI-Add-pattern-for-i64-sext_inreg-i32.patch>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> These are superseded by this patch, plus a piglit test for these
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <0001-R600-SI-Use-S_BFE_I64-for-64-bit-sext_inreg.patch><sign_extend_inreg.cl>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ping
>>>>> ping
>>>>> 
>>>> ping
>>> 
>>> Can you rebase this on top of master?
>>> 
>>> -Tom
>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> 
>> Updated version
>> 
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> -Tom


r222012



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list