ARM: Modified immediate assembly syntax (again?)

Asiri Rathnayake asiri.rathnayake at arm.com
Fri Nov 14 07:22:19 PST 2014


Hi Tim,

 

Sometime back there was a lot of debate about how to support the
modified-immediate syntax [1, 2]. I'm assessing the possibility of
re-opening this issue, and wondering why you abandoned the approach sketched
in [3]?

 

My grasp of the MC codebase is a bit primitive, but it looks like we can
shield the layers above MC with the approach suggested by Kristof in [4] and
get rid of the ri form of MCInst (thus removing the duplication). Is this a
fair assessment? I'm hoping to pursue a patch in this direction.

 

Please let me know what you think.

 

Best,

 

- Asiri

 

[1] http://marc.info/?t=137511225000002
<http://marc.info/?t=137511225000002&r=1&w=3> &r=1&w=3

[2] http://marc.info/?t=137675335900002
<http://marc.info/?t=137675335900002&r=1&w=2> &r=1&w=2

[3] http://reviews.llvm.org/D1432

[4] http://marc.info/?l=llvm-commits
<http://marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=137761888313460&w=2>
&m=137761888313460&w=2

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20141114/bcb75fda/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list