[PATCH] [X86] For Silvermont CPU use 16-bit division instead of 64-bit for small positive numbers

Quentin Colombet qcolombet at apple.com
Thu Nov 13 11:50:17 PST 2014

Previous message: [PATCH] [X86] For Silvermont CPU use 16-bit division instead of 64-bit for small positive numbers
Next message: [llvm] r221891 - Small optimization: once the size is know, we don't have to call fillCurWord.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Test case?

Thanks,
-Quentin

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5938

Previous message: [PATCH] [X86] For Silvermont CPU use 16-bit division instead of 64-bit for small positive numbers
Next message: [llvm] r221891 - Small optimization: once the size is know, we don't have to call fillCurWord.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list