[llvm] r221721 - [Reassociate] Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.

Chad Rosier mcrosier at codeaurora.org
Tue Nov 11 14:58:35 PST 2014


Author: mcrosier
Date: Tue Nov 11 16:58:35 2014
New Revision: 221721

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=221721&view=rev
Log:
[Reassociate] Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.

This is a reapplication of r221171, but we only perform the transformation
on expressions which include a multiplication.  We do not transform rem/div
operations as this doesn't appear to be safe in all cases.

Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
Removed:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/wrap-flags.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp?rev=221721&r1=221720&r2=221721&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp Tue Nov 11 16:58:35 2014
@@ -193,9 +193,8 @@ namespace {
     Value *OptimizeMul(BinaryOperator *I, SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops);
     Value *RemoveFactorFromExpression(Value *V, Value *Factor);
     void EraseInst(Instruction *I);
-    void optimizeFAddNegExpr(ConstantFP *ConstOperand, Instruction *I,
-                             int OperandNr);
     void OptimizeInst(Instruction *I);
+    Instruction *canonicalizeNegConstExpr(Instruction *I);
   };
 }
 
@@ -1947,31 +1946,95 @@ void Reassociate::EraseInst(Instruction
     }
 }
 
-void Reassociate::optimizeFAddNegExpr(ConstantFP *ConstOperand, Instruction *I,
-                                      int OperandNr) {
+// Canonicalize expressions of the following form:
+//  x + (-Constant * y) -> x - (Constant * y)
+//  x - (-Constant * y) -> x + (Constant * y)
+Instruction *Reassociate::canonicalizeNegConstExpr(Instruction *I) {
+  if (!I->hasOneUse() || I->getType()->isVectorTy())
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Must be a mul instruction.
+  unsigned Opcode = I->getOpcode();
+  if (Opcode != Instruction::Mul && Opcode != Instruction::FMul)
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Must have at least one constant operand.
+  Constant *C0 = dyn_cast<Constant>(I->getOperand(0));
+  Constant *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(I->getOperand(1));
+  if (!C0 && !C1)
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Must be a negative ConstantInt or ConstantFP.
+  Constant *C = C0 ? C0 : C1;
+  unsigned ConstIdx = C0 ? 0 : 1;
+  if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C)) {
+    if (!CI->isNegative())
+      return nullptr;
+  } else if (auto *CF = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(C)) {
+    if (!CF->isNegative())
+      return nullptr;
+  } else
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // User must be a binary operator with one or more uses.
+  Instruction *User = I->user_back();
+  if (!isa<BinaryOperator>(User) || !User->getNumUses())
+    return nullptr;
+
+  unsigned UserOpcode = User->getOpcode();
+  if (UserOpcode != Instruction::Add && UserOpcode != Instruction::FAdd &&
+      UserOpcode != Instruction::Sub && UserOpcode != Instruction::FSub)
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Subtraction is not commutative. Explicitly, the following transform is
+  // not valid: (-Constant * y) - x  -> x + (Constant * y)
+  if (!User->isCommutative() && User->getOperand(1) != I)
+    return nullptr;
+
   // Change the sign of the constant.
-  APFloat Val = ConstOperand->getValueAPF();
-  Val.changeSign();
-  I->setOperand(0, ConstantFP::get(ConstOperand->getContext(), Val));
-
-  assert(I->hasOneUse() && "Only a single use can be replaced.");
-  Instruction *Parent = I->user_back();
-
-  Value *OtherOperand = Parent->getOperand(1 - OperandNr);
-
-  unsigned Opcode = Parent->getOpcode();
-  assert(Opcode == Instruction::FAdd ||
-         (Opcode == Instruction::FSub && Parent->getOperand(1) == I));
-
-  BinaryOperator *NI = Opcode == Instruction::FAdd
-                           ? BinaryOperator::CreateFSub(OtherOperand, I)
-                           : BinaryOperator::CreateFAdd(OtherOperand, I);
-  NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(Parent)->getFastMathFlags());
-  NI->insertBefore(Parent);
-  NI->setName(Parent->getName() + ".repl");
-  Parent->replaceAllUsesWith(NI);
+  if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C))
+    I->setOperand(ConstIdx, ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), -CI->getValue()));
+  else {
+    ConstantFP *CF = cast<ConstantFP>(C);
+    APFloat Val = CF->getValueAPF();
+    Val.changeSign();
+    I->setOperand(ConstIdx, ConstantFP::get(CF->getContext(), Val));
+  }
+
+  // Canonicalize I to RHS to simplify the next bit of logic. E.g.,
+  // ((-Const*y) + x) -> (x + (-Const*y)).
+  if (User->getOperand(0) == I && User->isCommutative())
+    cast<BinaryOperator>(User)->swapOperands();
+
+  Value *Op0 = User->getOperand(0);
+  Value *Op1 = User->getOperand(1);
+  BinaryOperator *NI;
+  switch(UserOpcode) {
+  default:
+    llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode!");
+  case Instruction::Add:
+    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(Op0, Op1);
+    break;
+  case Instruction::Sub:
+    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(Op0, Op1);
+    break;
+  case Instruction::FAdd:
+    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateFSub(Op0, Op1);
+    NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(User)->getFastMathFlags());
+    break;
+  case Instruction::FSub:
+    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateFAdd(Op0, Op1);
+    NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(User)->getFastMathFlags());
+    break;
+  }
+
+  NI->insertBefore(User);
+  NI->setName(User->getName());
+  User->replaceAllUsesWith(NI);
   NI->setDebugLoc(I->getDebugLoc());
+  RedoInsts.insert(I);
   MadeChange = true;
+  return NI;
 }
 
 /// OptimizeInst - Inspect and optimize the given instruction. Note that erasing
@@ -1994,6 +2057,10 @@ void Reassociate::OptimizeInst(Instructi
       I = NI;
     }
 
+  // Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.
+  if (Instruction *Res = canonicalizeNegConstExpr(I))
+    I = Res;
+
   // Commute floating point binary operators, to canonicalize the order of their
   // operands.  This can potentially expose more CSE opportunities, and makes
   // writing other transformations simpler.
@@ -2014,24 +2081,6 @@ void Reassociate::OptimizeInst(Instructi
       }
     }
 
-    // Reassociate: x + -ConstantFP * y -> x - ConstantFP * y
-    // The FMul can also be an FDiv, and FAdd can be a FSub.
-    if (Opcode == Instruction::FMul || Opcode == Instruction::FDiv) {
-      if (ConstantFP *LHSConst = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(I->getOperand(0))) {
-        if (LHSConst->isNegative() && I->hasOneUse()) {
-          Instruction *Parent = I->user_back();
-          if (Parent->getOpcode() == Instruction::FAdd) {
-            if (Parent->getOperand(0) == I)
-              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 0);
-            else if (Parent->getOperand(1) == I)
-              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 1);
-          } else if (Parent->getOpcode() == Instruction::FSub)
-            if (Parent->getOperand(1) == I)
-              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 1);
-        }
-      }
-    }
-
     // FIXME: We should commute vector instructions as well.  However, this 
     // requires further analysis to determine the effect on later passes.
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll?rev=221721&r1=221720&r2=221721&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll Tue Nov 11 16:58:35 2014
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ define i32 @test14(i32 %X1, i32 %X2) {
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test14
 ; CHECK-NEXT: sub i32 %X1, %X2
-; CHECK-NEXT: mul i32 %tmp, 47
+; CHECK-NEXT: mul i32 %B2, 47
 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
 }
 

Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll?rev=221721&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll Tue Nov 11 16:58:35 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+; RUN: opt -reassociate -gvn -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y)
+define double @test1(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test1
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %mul
+
+  %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
+  %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
+  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
+  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
+  ret double %mul3
+}
+
+; (x + -0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x - 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y)
+define double @test2(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %mul
+
+  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
+  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
+  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
+  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
+  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
+  ret double %mul3
+}
+
+; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + 0.1234 * y)
+define double @test3(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test3
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double
+
+  %mul = fmul double %y, 1.234000e-01
+  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
+  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
+  %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
+  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
+  ret double %mul3
+}
+
+; Canonicalize (x - -1234 * y)
+define i64 @test4(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test4
+; CHECK-NEXT: mul i64 %y, 1234
+; CHECK-NEXT: add i64 %mul, %x
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
+
+  %mul = mul i64 %y, -1234
+  %sub = sub i64 %x, %mul
+  ret i64 %sub
+}
+
+; Canonicalize (x - -0.1234 * y)
+define double @test5(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test5
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double
+
+  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
+  %sub = fsub double %x, %mul
+  ret double %sub
+}
+
+; Don't modify (-0.1234 * y - x)
+define double @test6(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test6
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %mul, %x
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %sub
+
+  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
+  %sub = fsub double %mul, %x
+  ret double %sub
+}
+
+; Canonicalize (-0.1234 * y + x) -> (x - 0.1234 * y)
+define double @test7(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test7
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
+
+  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
+  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
+  ret double %add
+}
+
+; Canonicalize (y * -0.1234 + x) -> (x - 0.1234 * y)
+define double @test8(double %x, double %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test8
+; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
+; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
+
+  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
+  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
+  ret double %add
+}

Removed: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll?rev=221720&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll (removed)
@@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: opt -reassociate -gvn -S < %s | FileCheck %s
-
-; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y)
-; so CSE can simplify it further
-define double @lift_sign1(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp uwtable {
-; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign1(
-  %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
-  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
-  %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
-  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
-  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
-; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd %mul1, %x
-; CHECK: %add2.repl = fsub double %x, %mul
-; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-ret double %mul3
-}
-
-; (x + -0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x - 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y)
-; GVN can then rewrite it even further
-define double @lift_sign2(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp uwtable {
-; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign2(
-  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
-  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
-  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-; CHECK-NOT: %add = fadd double %mul, %x
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK: %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
-; CHECK: %add.repl = fsub double %x, %mul
-; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add.repl, %add.repl
-  ret double %mul3
-}
-
-; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + 0.1234 * y)
-define double @lift_sign3(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp uwtable {
-; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign3(
-  %mul = fmul double %y, 1.234000e-01
-  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
-  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-  %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
-  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
-; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add
-  ret double %mul3
-}
-
-; (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x + -0.1234 / y) -> (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x - 0.1234 / y)
-; so CSE can simplify it further
-define double @lift_sign4(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp uwtable {
-; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign4(
-  %div = fdiv double 1.234000e-01, %y
-  %add = fadd double %div, %x
-  %div1 = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
-  %add2 = fadd double %div1, %x
-  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK-NOT: %div1 = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
-; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd double %div1, %x
-; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
-; CHECK: %add2.repl = fsub double %x, %div
-; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2.repl
-  ret double %mul3
-}

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/wrap-flags.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/wrap-flags.ll?rev=221721&r1=221720&r2=221721&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/wrap-flags.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/wrap-flags.ll Tue Nov 11 16:58:35 2014
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_to_mul_nsw(
 ; CHECK: %mul = mul i32 %i, -2147483648
-; CHECK: %mul2 = add i32 %mul, 1
+; CHECK: add i32 %mul, 1
 define i32 @shl_to_mul_nsw(i32 %i) {
 entry:
   %mul = shl nsw i32 %i, 31
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ entry:
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_to_mul_nuw(
 ; CHECK: %mul = mul nuw i32 %i, 4
-; CHECK: %mul2 = add i32 %mul, 1
+; CHECK: add i32 %mul, 1
 define i32 @shl_to_mul_nuw(i32 %i) {
 entry:
   %mul = shl nuw i32 %i, 2
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ entry:
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_to_mul_nuw_nsw(
 ; CHECK: %mul = mul nuw nsw i32 %i, 4
-; CHECK: %mul2 = add i32 %mul, 1
+; CHECK: add i32 %mul, 1
 define i32 @shl_to_mul_nuw_nsw(i32 %i) {
 entry:
   %mul = shl nuw nsw i32 %i, 2





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list