[PATCH] [Power] Improve the expansion of atomic loads/stores

Robin Morisset morisset at google.com
Thu Oct 2 14:37:44 PDT 2014

Thank you ! This paragraph of the documentation was indeed what I was
thinking about, when saying that atomicity is not a problem, I should have
made it more explicit. I will try to generate tests for the indexed
versions and add them in.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> (BTW, the doubleword accesses only apply to 64-bit -- I got lazy and
> didn't provide the parenthetical about that.)
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5587
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20141002/12b24fd1/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list