[PATCH] [Power] Improve the expansion of atomic loads/stores
morisset at google.com
Thu Oct 2 14:37:44 PDT 2014
Thank you ! This paragraph of the documentation was indeed what I was
thinking about, when saying that atomicity is not a problem, I should have
made it more explicit. I will try to generate tests for the indexed
versions and add them in.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> (BTW, the doubleword accesses only apply to 64-bit -- I got lazy and
> didn't provide the parenthetical about that.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits