br_cc definition

[deadal nix]

How do we get that in ?

2014-09-23 22:37 GMT-07:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "deadal nix" <deadalnix at gmail.com>
> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > Cc: "llvm-commits" <llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:29:12 AM
> > Subject: Re: br_cc definition
> >
> >
> > The argument 0 is the condition code type. 1 and 2 are arguments. 3
> > it the target of the branch. So SDTCisVT<0, OtherVT> and should not
> > be an int.
> >
>
> Ah, you're right: Those are represented by CondCodeSDNode (not integer
> constants). LGTM.
>
>  -Hal
>
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-23 5:42 GMT-07:00 Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > :
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "deadal nix" < deadalnix at gmail.com >
> > > To: "llvm-commits" < llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:20:59 AM
> > > Subject: br_cc definition
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As per
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-August/075321.html
> > > ,
> > > it look like I'm not the only one to want to match br_cc directly.
> > > So I prepared a patch.
> >
> > +def SDTBrCC : SDTypeProfile<0, 4, [ // brcc
> > + SDTCisVT<0, OtherVT>, SDTCisSameAs<1, 2>, SDTCisVT<3, OtherVT>
> > +]>;
> > +
> >
> > Shouldn't the type constraint for the condition code be SDTCisInt<0>?
> >
> > -Hal
> >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > llvm-commits mailing list
> > > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Hal Finkel
> > Assistant Computational Scientist
> > Leadership Computing Facility
> > Argonne National Laboratory
> >
> >
>
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Assistant Computational Scientist
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140924/3f0e50a5/attachment.html>