[PATCH] [X86] Allow atomic operations using immediates to avoid using a register
morisset at google.com
Tue Sep 2 13:29:06 PDT 2014
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:
> ping, still waiting on someone with knowledge of the X86 backend.
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com>
>> Add back the modification to X86CodeEmitter as the Jit resurrected
>> + an extra comment on the implicitness of the lock prefix before xchg.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits