[PATCH] [X86] Allow atomic operations using immediates to avoid using a register

Robin Morisset morisset at google.com
Tue Sep 2 13:29:06 PDT 2014


ping.


On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:

> ping, still waiting on someone with knowledge of the X86 backend.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>   Add back the modification to X86CodeEmitter as the Jit resurrected
>>
>> + an extra comment on the implicitness of the lock prefix before xchg.
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4796
>>
>> Files:
>>   lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp
>>   lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
>>   lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
>>   test/CodeGen/X86/atomic_mi.ll
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140902/000bab5b/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list