[PATCH] X86: Fix conflict over ESI between base register and rep; movsl
rnk at google.com
Fri Aug 29 13:56:08 PDT 2014
Chandler suggested creating an opaque DAG node and lowering it in MI
*after* ISel. The MI layer is much less fluid than the DAG.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> I'm still planning to retry the "store ESI in another physreg while rep
> movs'ing" approach instead of bailing out, but that's orthogonal to this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits