[PATCH] [X86] Allow atomic operations using immediates to avoid using a register
morisset at google.com
Wed Aug 27 14:16:48 PDT 2014
ping, still waiting on someone with knowledge of the X86 backend.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:
> Add back the modification to X86CodeEmitter as the Jit resurrected
> + an extra comment on the implicitness of the lock prefix before xchg.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits