Checkin of the ABI testsuite

Jonathan Roelofs jonathan at codesourcery.com
Wed Aug 6 16:51:06 PDT 2014



On 8/6/14, 3:26 PM, Srivastava, Sunil wrote:
> I just checked in another directory of ABI testsuite. This completes the
> testsuite checkins, except for a FAQ that I will checkin in a day or two.
>
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
>  > Alternatively, why do they have to be executable in first place?
I think Joerg's question is about the exec bit on the file permissions... If 
they're text, and not scripts, why not do this to all of them before checkin?

`find . -name "*.x" | chmod a-x`


Cheers,
Jon

>
> I assume you refer to the extension .x. While the extension is .x, they are test
> files. They have 'wrong' extension intentionally in order to support a mechanism
> of handling failures. The FAQ will go into it in more details.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sunil Srivastava
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>

-- 
Jon Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list