[PATCH] Tablegen binary literals should be sized

Sean Silva chisophugis at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 15:03:26 PDT 2014


Did you see anywhere in the docs that needed updating?

Regarding patch 0005, thankfully those were benign since they just had
leading 0's. Can you doublecheck the diagnostic quality? We need to give a
clear indication that what is wrong so that users don't get left scratching
their heads.


+  /// resolveListElementReference - This method is used to implement
+  /// VarListElementInit::resolveReferences.  If the list element is
resolvable
+  /// now, we return the resolved value, otherwise we return null.
+  Init *resolveListElementReference(Record &R, const RecordVal *RV,
+                                    unsigned Elt) const override {
+    llvm_unreachable("Illegal element reference off bits<n>");
+  }

This saddens me... all this TableGen code really needs to be refactored...
There may be a simple refactor for this resolveListElementReference
situation that does not require plunging into the murky depths of the
resolution machinery.


-- Sean Silva



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Moving this from LLVMDev (
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-July/075223.html) now
> that i have patches i’d welcome reviews of.  The following is the initial
> summary from that email thread.
>
> "Currently tablegen parses binary literals such as 0b011 and immediately
> turns them in to integers internally.  Due to this, 0b011 is a 2-bit value
> because tablegen will happily drop leading zeroes on integers.
>
> I propose that we change this, and store binary literals with a size.  I
> think this is much more natural, as when the user writes a value with 3
> bits, I think they expect to get a value with 3 bits, and not a 2-bit value
> which is silently truncated and later silently zero extended.
>
> Given this, I would then like to extend bits initializers to accept these
> new sized binary literals.  For example, I would like to be able to write
>
> bits<2> opc;
> bits<8> x = { opc, 0b1100, rd{1}, rs{0} }
>
> This would let us write some encodings much more concisely, instead of
> having to put each initializer on its own line.”
>
>
> For those interested in the low level details, i’ve changed binary
> literals such as 0b011 from creating an integer ‘3’, to creating a BitsInit
> ‘{ 0, 1, 1}’.  As Sean suggested, this was better than introducing yet
> another type just for binary literals.
>
> As part of this, BitsInit values now had to be able to be typed.  This is
> because we had uses of binary literals which expected to be typed (for
> example list<bits<2>> [0b00, 0b01]).  I’ve moved BitsInit from being a
> subclass of Init to a subclass of TypedInit to allow this.
>
> Note that patches 2 and 3 really need to be committed together.  I can
> squash them before commit, but just wanted to present the changes
> independently.
>
> Patch 5 can also be committed without any of the others, but just shows
> that this did actually catch some useful cases where we mismatched sizes of
> binary expressions.
>
> Thanks,
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140731/0c4eea50/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list