[PATCH] Make LNT compatible with PostgreSQL

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Wed Jul 2 13:12:40 PDT 2014


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2 July 2014 18:59, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
> > Yep, so we use Postgres internally extensively.
>
> Given that pgsql is already well tested internally, should we switch
> from SQLite on public server ASAP? The frequent server crash is
> causing some annoyance.
>

We don't currently have Postgres available on the server, so it will take
us (me?) some work to get it installed and then migrate the database. I am
going on vacation for two weeks, so I won't be available to do this for a
little while.

 - Daniel


> > Right now, if you make an empty postgres db, and just use the URL in the
> LNT
> > config file, it will create the tables on first run.  That is how I have
> > been doing it. This patch is adding a command line option to do the same
> > thing.
> >
> > I think if we are going to expose support for Postgres to users, which I
> > agree we should, we need a new section in the documentation explaining
> how
> > to do it, and at least a smoke test in test suite to make sure we don’t
> > break support, and a test to make sure the create call works with a
> postgres
> > URLs.
> >
> > Yi, can you add those things to your patch, or in subsequent patches?
> >
> > It would also be important to have a section of docs on how to migrate
> from
> > sqlite to Postgres, as I assume that is the path most users would end up
> > taking.
>
> Sure.
>
> > We do also have to be careful.  There are situations I have found were
> the
> > same flask queries don’t return the same results on sqlite and Postgres.
>  I
> > have not hit this in LNT, but in development of LNT extensions, so it is
> > something to watch out for!
> >
> > On Jul 2, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> >
> > We run our internal LNT against Postgres and have done so for quite a
> while,
> > Chris can you check this patch and see why we don't need it? Is it just
> > because we manually updated the configuration?
> >
> >  - Daniel
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Patch...
> >>
> >> On 2 July 2014 17:13, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Public LLVM perf server suffers from frequent database locking issues.
> >> > SQLite is suspected to cause the problem as it is not designed for
> >> > multi-user system like LNT.
> >> >
> >> > The patch makes LNT compatible with PostgreSQL. Although theoretically
> >> > MySQL should work as well, it's not tested.
> >> >
> >> > SQLite is still supported and used by default, since setting up
> >> > PostgreSQL is difficult and unnecessary if deployed locally.
> >> >
> >> > To use PostgreSQL, you need to create a pgdb manually:
> >> >     CREATE DATABASE "lnt.db";
> >> > And run:
> >> >     lnt create SANDBOX --db-dir postgresql://user@localhost
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Yi
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140702/af0c6392/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list