[PATCH] Alternative way of representing comdats

[Reid Kleckner]

+1, I don't think we need to support RAUW on comdats.


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>
wrote:

>  It seems like we have rough consensus that COMDATs should behave more
> like Types than Values.  Commandeering this differential.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4178
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140617/74311e8a/attachment.html>