[LLVMdev] ARM64 -> AArch64 merge status
apazos at codeaurora.org
Fri May 9 13:11:03 PDT 2014
Thanks for the update report.
Things are looking good on our side. Thanks to Tim who has been quick in
fixing issues/reviewing patches.
[ARM64] fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7d713c0: f64 =
[ARM64] Assertion 'hiBitsSet <= numBits && "Too many bits to set!"
[ARM64] Unable to emit UBFX in some cases
ARM64: make sure FastISel uses a GPR64 source in 64-bit extensions.
[ARM64] Miscompile possibly due to incorrect fcsel
[ARM64] CSINC is not generated when there is ZEXT between SETCC and AND
[PATCH] Fix use_iterator in ARM64AddressTypePromotion
Others (unresolved but they are clang related or test issue):
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Grosbach
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:24 AM
To: James Molloy
Cc: llvm-commits; LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ARM64 -> AArch64 merge status
Wow. I dont know how else to describe it. Just wow. This continues to be
an amazing process. Thank you to everyone for your work in making this
On May 9, 2014, at 8:41 AM, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote:
Its been two weeks since I sent the last merge progress email, so here is
TL;DR: Almost done!
Tim is considering suggesting making the final switchover sometime next
week. This would be the final push, where AArch64 gets deleted and ARM64
gets renamed to AArch64, and would signal the end of the merge process. If
any of you know of any reason why these two loving backends cannot be
merged, speak now or forever hold your peace! J
Times are incredibly approximate and are in man-days/weeks.
· Requirement: No regressions
§ [1w] Regression tests
· All Clang regression tests ported.
· Almost all LLVM regression tests ported the only thing left is
MC-level diagnostics tests. These are in progress (Bradley) currently 25%
of the way through the diagnostics test file.
§ [?] QuIC internal tests
· No further information available, but no public bugs raised.
§ [DONE] ARM internal tests
· All test suites pass.
§ [0d] Apple internal tests
· Tim says were looking reasonable here J
· This only blocks a go/no-go, and there are no actual actions
here at the moment (according to Tim)
§ [DONE] LLVM test suite
§ [DONE] MC Hammer
§ [DONE] Emperor
· This is a random test suite so has the possibility to uncover more
problems. Our acceptance criterion is 3 days runtime without finding any
bugs, which we have now hit.
§ No precise fixed performance baseline
§ [DONE] Investigate significant performance regressions justify fix/not
· No performance blockers reported.
· Requirement: Feature parity
o [DONE] Big endian
§ Big endian support is now complete and all known bugs are fixed upstream.
This includes NEON instruction selection.
§ Im still running testing to validate, but this can be thought of as
o [DONE] Support for no fpu/no neon/ no crc
o [DONE] A53 scheduler
o [DONE] Inline assembly
o [DONE] Predefines
o [DONE] Conditionalise cyclone/Darwin
§ Only the LDR q -> LDP d, d splitting pass to really conditionalise
only benchmarks will really show though.
o [?] ADRP CSE
§ This optimization, being worked on by Jiangning, has been half ported to
ARM64. But it hasnt been committed to AArch64 yet, so it cant be
considered a merge blocker.
§ Jiangning and Quentin are working together on testing and benchmarking
o [2d] fastcc & guaranteed tail opt
§ Fastcc support (proper tail call optimization) is in progress (Jiangning)
o [2d?] Post-increment NEON ld/st
§ Post-indexed NEON loads and stores are in progress (Hao)
LLVM Developers mailing list
<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits