[PATCH] ARM big endian function argument passing
cpirker at a-bix.com
Fri May 9 02:51:33 PDT 2014
the ABI for 32 bits is different with respect to the 64 ABI, as it
requires any integral fundamental data types to be expanded to a size of
On 05/08/14 16:56, James Molloy wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> This patch does not seem to address sub-word stack arguments. If a
> stack argument is < 32 bits, surely it should have an offset applied
> to it in ARMISelLowering::lowerFormalArguments() and friends, similar
> to what ARM64 does?
> Is the ABI for 32-bit different in this respect to the 64-bit ABI?
> On 8 May 2014 15:22, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org
> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
> On 8 May 2014 15:20, Christian Pirker <cpirker at a-bix.com
> <mailto:cpirker at a-bix.com>> wrote:
> > Test suite have been run with GNU libraries in little and big
> > I committed this patch as rL208316.
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits