[PATCH] PR19091, libcxxabi fix of wrong demangling of "operator>(int)"

Stepan Dyatkovskiy stpworld at narod.ru
Wed May 7 11:13:56 PDT 2014

I have the same opinion. IMHO, the best solution is to extend Db with information about what was parsed. But how we could solve it now? Is there any other ways to distinguish operator> from tail of "<some_operator>" ?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list