[PATCH] Add optimization remarks to the loop unroller and vectorizer.

Hal Finkel hfinkel at anl.gov
Tue Apr 22 14:06:45 PDT 2014


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google.com>
> To: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com>
> Cc: "llvm commits" <llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add optimization remarks to the loop unroller and	vectorizer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nadav Rotem < nrotem at apple.com >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, excellent. There is ongoing discussion on cfg-list about the
> proper name for ‘unroll’, but when we make a decision we can rename
> the remark and some variables in the code.
> 
> 
> Not sure what cfg-list is, but this is easy enough to change at
> anytime.

He means cfe ;)

 -Hal

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I would also like to report places where we fail to vectorize but we
> can do it later on.
> 
> 
> Yeah, but for that we want to use the negated form of -Rpass (maybe
> -Rmiss), which I still have not implemented.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks. Diego.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list