[LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans

Jiangning Liu liujiangning1 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 17:44:12 PDT 2014


Hi Tom,

Do you mean the solution I provided at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-April/071797.html doesn't
work? I will have a look ASAP.

Thanks,
-Jiangning
2014-4-10 下午9:27于 "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard.net>写道:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:15:50AM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I'm extremely appreciative of your help on back porting those patches!
> >
> > > > 198937 Make sure -use-init-array has intended effect on all AArch64
> ELF
> > > > targets, not just linux.
> > >
> > > I wasn't able to merge this commit, because it broke ABI compatibility
> of
> > > the LLVM library shared object.  This is because it removes the
> function
> > > llvm::AArch64LinuxTargetObjectFileInitialize ( llvm::MCContext&,
> > >                                                llvm:TargetMachine
> const&);
> > >
> > > Does the clang commit mentioned above require this LLVM change?  I
> > > wasn't sure, so I didn't merge it.  If you can come up with a version
> of
> > > this patch that doesn't break the ABI, then I can merge it.  Let me
> know
> > > what you want to do.
> > >
> > Yes, this patch is required by the clang commit. The patch is to change
> the
> > name only, so can you simply keep two methods before and after the
> > replacement and make them to have the same content, I think it should
> work
> > and will not break ABI.
> >
>
> I'm having trouble porting the clang commit r198940.  It causes two
> tests to fail:
>
> Clang :: Driver/bindings.c
> Clang :: Driver/unknown-gcc-arch.c
>
> Would you be able to prepare a working patch that I can apply to the
> stable branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140411/fc2b9dcf/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list