[LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans

[Richard Smith]

It looks like this could be raised to 100% by restoring the prior order of
the llvm::Intrinsic enum?


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Jiangning Liu <liujiangning1 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> Please refer to attached abi-compliance-checker report for those patches
> I'm asking for back porting to 3.4.1.
>
> Test Results
> ------------------------------
> Total Header Files 882 <#145261e7e2a6e86e_Headers>Total Shared Libraries 2<#145261e7e2a6e86e_Libs> Total
> Symbols / Types5491 / 2756 Verdict
>
> *Incompatible(0.1%)*
>
> So the backward compatibility is 99.9%, and I don't see big issues.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>
>
> 2014-04-02 23:36 GMT+08:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>:
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:38:18PM +0100, Tim Northover wrote:
>> > Hi Renato,
>> >
>> > > Apart from this one, I don't see any problem with the merges regarding
>> > > ABI compatibility.
>> >
>> > I think Tom meant ABI compatibility in the libLLVMWhatever.so
>> > libraries (and headers) rather than generated code. The 3.4.1 binaries
>> > should be drop-in replacements for whatever systems we produce.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I was talking about LLVM's library ABI compatibility with 3.4.0
>> rather AARCH64 ABI compatibility.
>>
>> -Tom
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140403/c0b444ca/attachment.html>