[PATCH] Add support for a directory argument to llvm-link

[Rafael Espíndola]

> Wouldn't it be useful to instead have an option that specifies a file with
> the list of source files?  That would eliminate the need for response files,
> if the only reason for them was the length of the command line.  This way a
> user could provide an arbitrary list of input files, not necessarily a
> complete directory.

Sorry, what would the difference be from response files to the new
option? Just using "llvm-link -list foo" instead of "llvm-link @foo"?

Cheers,
Rafael