[patch] Drop support for non-cfi capable assemblers
echristo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 13:35:18 PDT 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote:
> On 23/03/14 11:21 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler
>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we
>> care overly much about.
> No one is asking for a bleeding edge compiler, that's just the way
> the project seems to want to go reducing the usefulness of the
> resulting code and compiler.
Huh? Your phrasing doesn't make any sense. What do you mean? Could you
try rephrasing this?
More information about the llvm-commits