[PATCH] Propagate -fno-unwind-tables to EHABI
tzuhsiang.chien at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 08:13:46 PDT 2014
BTW, I found that I was wrong in the previous comment. If we wish to keep the test cases unchanged, then we should emit unwinding information for the functions with neither `uwtable` nor `nounwind` attributes. (We have this already in the diff#2.)
But this will raise another problem: we are not going further with this patch. We still can't control the availability of unwind table with an function attribute. Maybe further consideration is required? I have just read your mail in llvm-dev mailing list; however I am too busy to reply it now. I will reply it as soon as possible.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/ARMException.cpp:91
@@ -80,3 +90,3 @@
ARMTargetStreamer &ATS = getTargetStreamer();
- if (!Asm->MF->getFunction()->needsUnwindTableEntry())
+ if (Asm->MF->getFunction()->doesNotThrow())
It seems that this line should not be changed? Otherwise, the `uwtable+nounwind` case will emit cantunwind.
More information about the llvm-commits