[llvm] r203797 - CodeGenPrep: sink extends of illegal types into use block.
Manuel Jacob
me at manueljacob.de
Thu Mar 13 06:36:25 PDT 2014
Author: mjacob
Date: Thu Mar 13 08:36:25 2014
New Revision: 203797
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=203797&view=rev
Log:
CodeGenPrep: sink extends of illegal types into use block.
Summary:
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.
This is an update of D2973 which was reverted because of a bug reported
as PR19084.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, chapuni
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
CC: llvm-commits, alex, chapuni
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3021
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/mul128_sext_loop.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/extend-sink-hoist.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/README.txt
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp?rev=203797&r1=203796&r2=203797&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp Thu Mar 13 08:36:25 2014
@@ -464,40 +464,8 @@ void CodeGenPrepare::EliminateMostlyEmpt
DEBUG(dbgs() << "AFTER:\n" << *DestBB << "\n\n\n");
}
-/// OptimizeNoopCopyExpression - If the specified cast instruction is a noop
-/// copy (e.g. it's casting from one pointer type to another, i32->i8 on PPC),
-/// sink it into user blocks to reduce the number of virtual
-/// registers that must be created and coalesced.
-///
-/// Return true if any changes are made.
-///
-static bool OptimizeNoopCopyExpression(CastInst *CI, const TargetLowering &TLI){
- // If this is a noop copy,
- EVT SrcVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getOperand(0)->getType());
- EVT DstVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getType());
-
- // This is an fp<->int conversion?
- if (SrcVT.isInteger() != DstVT.isInteger())
- return false;
-
- // If this is an extension, it will be a zero or sign extension, which
- // isn't a noop.
- if (SrcVT.bitsLT(DstVT)) return false;
-
- // If these values will be promoted, find out what they will be promoted
- // to. This helps us consider truncates on PPC as noop copies when they
- // are.
- if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), SrcVT) ==
- TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
- SrcVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), SrcVT);
- if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), DstVT) ==
- TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
- DstVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), DstVT);
-
- // If, after promotion, these are the same types, this is a noop copy.
- if (SrcVT != DstVT)
- return false;
-
+/// SinkCast - Sink the specified cast instruction into its user blocks
+static bool SinkCast(CastInst *CI) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = CI->getParent();
/// InsertedCasts - Only insert a cast in each block once.
@@ -547,6 +515,43 @@ static bool OptimizeNoopCopyExpression(C
return MadeChange;
}
+/// OptimizeNoopCopyExpression - If the specified cast instruction is a noop
+/// copy (e.g. it's casting from one pointer type to another, i32->i8 on PPC),
+/// sink it into user blocks to reduce the number of virtual
+/// registers that must be created and coalesced.
+///
+/// Return true if any changes are made.
+///
+static bool OptimizeNoopCopyExpression(CastInst *CI, const TargetLowering &TLI){
+ // If this is a noop copy,
+ EVT SrcVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getOperand(0)->getType());
+ EVT DstVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getType());
+
+ // This is an fp<->int conversion?
+ if (SrcVT.isInteger() != DstVT.isInteger())
+ return false;
+
+ // If this is an extension, it will be a zero or sign extension, which
+ // isn't a noop.
+ if (SrcVT.bitsLT(DstVT)) return false;
+
+ // If these values will be promoted, find out what they will be promoted
+ // to. This helps us consider truncates on PPC as noop copies when they
+ // are.
+ if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), SrcVT) ==
+ TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
+ SrcVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), SrcVT);
+ if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), DstVT) ==
+ TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
+ DstVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), DstVT);
+
+ // If, after promotion, these are the same types, this is a noop copy.
+ if (SrcVT != DstVT)
+ return false;
+
+ return SinkCast(CI);
+}
+
/// OptimizeCmpExpression - sink the given CmpInst into user blocks to reduce
/// the number of virtual registers that must be created and coalesced. This is
/// a clear win except on targets with multiple condition code registers
@@ -2811,8 +2816,16 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeInst(Instru
return true;
if (isa<ZExtInst>(I) || isa<SExtInst>(I)) {
- bool MadeChange = MoveExtToFormExtLoad(I);
- return MadeChange | OptimizeExtUses(I);
+ /// Sink a zext or sext into its user blocks if the target type doesn't
+ /// fit in one register
+ if (TLI && TLI->getTypeAction(CI->getContext(),
+ TLI->getValueType(CI->getType())) ==
+ TargetLowering::TypeExpandInteger) {
+ return SinkCast(CI);
+ } else {
+ bool MadeChange = MoveExtToFormExtLoad(I);
+ return MadeChange | OptimizeExtUses(I);
+ }
}
return false;
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/README.txt
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/README.txt?rev=203797&r1=203796&r2=203797&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/README.txt (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/README.txt Thu Mar 13 08:36:25 2014
@@ -1444,54 +1444,6 @@ it would be nice to produce "into" somed
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-This code:
-
-void vec_mpys1(int y[], const int x[], int scaler) {
-int i;
-for (i = 0; i < 150; i++)
- y[i] += (((long long)scaler * (long long)x[i]) >> 31);
-}
-
-Compiles to this loop with GCC 3.x:
-
-.L5:
- movl %ebx, %eax
- imull (%edi,%ecx,4)
- shrdl $31, %edx, %eax
- addl %eax, (%esi,%ecx,4)
- incl %ecx
- cmpl $149, %ecx
- jle .L5
-
-llvm-gcc compiles it to the much uglier:
-
-LBB1_1: ## bb1
- movl 24(%esp), %eax
- movl (%eax,%edi,4), %ebx
- movl %ebx, %ebp
- imull %esi, %ebp
- movl %ebx, %eax
- mull %ecx
- addl %ebp, %edx
- sarl $31, %ebx
- imull %ecx, %ebx
- addl %edx, %ebx
- shldl $1, %eax, %ebx
- movl 20(%esp), %eax
- addl %ebx, (%eax,%edi,4)
- incl %edi
- cmpl $150, %edi
- jne LBB1_1 ## bb1
-
-The issue is that we hoist the cast of "scaler" to long long outside of the
-loop, the value comes into the loop as two values, and
-RegsForValue::getCopyFromRegs doesn't know how to put an AssertSext on the
-constructed BUILD_PAIR which represents the cast value.
-
-This can be handled by making CodeGenPrepare sink the cast.
-
-//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
Test instructions can be eliminated by using EFLAGS values from arithmetic
instructions. This is currently not done for mul, and, or, xor, neg, shl,
sra, srl, shld, shrd, atomic ops, and others. It is also currently not done
Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/mul128_sext_loop.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/mul128_sext_loop.ll?rev=203797&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/mul128_sext_loop.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/mul128_sext_loop.ll Thu Mar 13 08:36:25 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
+
+define void @test(i64* nocapture %arr, i64 %arrsize, i64 %factor) nounwind uwtable {
+ %1 = icmp sgt i64 %arrsize, 0
+ br i1 %1, label %.lr.ph, label %._crit_edge
+
+.lr.ph: ; preds = %0
+ %2 = sext i64 %factor to i128
+ br label %3
+
+; <label>:3 ; preds = %3, %.lr.ph
+; CHECK-NOT: mul
+; CHECK: imulq
+; CHECK-NOT: mul
+ %carry.02 = phi i128 [ 0, %.lr.ph ], [ %10, %3 ]
+ %i.01 = phi i64 [ 0, %.lr.ph ], [ %11, %3 ]
+ %4 = getelementptr inbounds i64* %arr, i64 %i.01
+ %5 = load i64* %4, align 8
+ %6 = sext i64 %5 to i128
+ %7 = mul nsw i128 %6, %2
+ %8 = add nsw i128 %7, %carry.02
+ %.tr = trunc i128 %8 to i64
+ %9 = and i64 %.tr, 9223372036854775807
+ store i64 %9, i64* %4, align 8
+ %10 = ashr i128 %8, 63
+ %11 = add nsw i64 %i.01, 1
+ %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %11, %arrsize
+ br i1 %exitcond, label %._crit_edge, label %3
+
+._crit_edge: ; preds = %3, %0
+ ret void
+}
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/extend-sink-hoist.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/extend-sink-hoist.ll?rev=203797&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/extend-sink-hoist.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/extend-sink-hoist.ll Thu Mar 13 08:36:25 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+; RUN: opt -codegenprepare -disable-cgp-branch-opts -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+; The first cast should be sunk into block2, in order that the
+; instruction selector can form an efficient
+; i64 * i64 -> i128 multiplication.
+define i128 @sink(i64* %mem1, i64* %mem2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: block1:
+; CHECK-NEXT: load
+block1:
+ %l1 = load i64* %mem1
+ %s1 = sext i64 %l1 to i128
+ br label %block2
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: block2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sext
+; CHECK-NEXT: load
+; CHECK-NEXT: sext
+block2:
+ %l2 = load i64* %mem2
+ %s2 = sext i64 %l2 to i128
+ %res = mul i128 %s1, %s2
+ ret i128 %res
+}
+
+; The first cast should be hoisted into block1, in order that the
+; instruction selector can form an extend-load.
+define i64 @hoist(i32* %mem1, i32* %mem2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: block1:
+; CHECK-NEXT: load
+; CHECK-NEXT: sext
+block1:
+ %l1 = load i32* %mem1
+ br label %block2
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: block2:
+; CHECK-NEXT: load
+; CHECK-NEXT: sext
+block2:
+ %s1 = sext i32 %l1 to i64
+ %l2 = load i32* %mem2
+ %s2 = sext i32 %l2 to i64
+ %res = mul i64 %s1, %s2
+ ret i64 %res
+}
+
+; Make sure the cast sink logic and OptimizeExtUses don't end up in an infinite
+; loop.
+define i128 @use_ext_source() {
+block1:
+ %v1 = or i64 undef, undef
+ %v2 = zext i64 %v1 to i128
+ br i1 undef, label %block2, label %block3
+
+block2:
+ %v3 = add i64 %v1, 1
+ %v4 = zext i64 %v3 to i128
+ br label %block3
+
+block3:
+ %res = phi i128 [ %v2, %block1 ], [ %v4, %block2 ]
+ ret i128 %res
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list