[polly] move detection of polly libs to LLVM

Sebastian Pop spop at codeaurora.org
Wed Mar 12 14:21:08 PDT 2014

Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Why is this needed? I would really rather these stay isolated in polly...

We need this to statically link polly into tools like opt.

If we only link LLVMPolly.a against the libs required by polly, linking
LLVMPolly.a into the tools, the linker complains about missing symbols.
This does not happen when linking into the tools both LLVMPolly.a and the
required polly libs.

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list