Improving support for CMake-based applications

[Chandler Carruth]

Brad, Takumi;

Some part of this patch series has thoroughly broken the
option LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY. Can you look into this? This is
breaking some of our release processes. =/


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:

> On 02/09/2014 07:27 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote:
> > Landed to r201046..r201053.
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> On 01/24/2014 03:44 PM, Brad King wrote:
> > It also communicates library dependencies (from llvm-build) to
> > applications in a way that CMake builtin features understand.
> > A follow-up to this series will use this feature to avoid explicit
> > handling of dependencies and system libraries in LLVM-Config.cmake.
>
> It looks like you already took care of the dependency propagation
> in r200764 by splitting llvm_map_components_to_libnames out of
> explicit_map_components_to_libraries.  I've revised my follow-up
> series accordingly.
>
> Please find attached my next patch series.  The first patch adds a
> sanity check when using tablegen outside LLVM.  The other two patches
> simplify some code in LLVM-Config APIs and in supporting infrastructure
> (in both the CMake and Makefile build systems).
>
> Thanks,
> -Brad
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140210/503b94dd/attachment.html>