[Sanitizer] Add rudimentary support for using libbacktrace in symbolizer.

[Chandler Carruth]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:11:16PM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> > I've mailed out a patch to the LLVM developer's policy which should
> clarify
> > this. The only thing that would help is for the authors of these three
> > patches (and the fourth patch I found later) to just email a copy of the
> > patch to llvm-commits, or if any of you have commit access to directly
> > commit the patch.
>
> Here I'm submitting my contribution to the libbacktrace sanitization patch,
> which has been posted in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02338.html
> Note that Alexey has made quite a few changes to the patch that has been
> eventually committed as r196875, so is this post sufficient for Alexey
> to commit again his r196875 change?
>

Just speaking from a policy perspective, yes, this is all we needed. Again,
very sorry for all the trouble here. =[
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140113/c33e85f8/attachment.html>