[llvm] r199051 - llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll: Tweak to satisfy r199050.

[Sean Silva]

Wouldn't it be better to use a more precise regex? E.g. `\bshl` or even
`\sshl`.

-- Sean Silva


On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:41 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>wrote:

> Author: chapuni
> Date: Sun Jan 12 08:41:41 2014
> New Revision: 199051
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=199051&view=rev
> Log:
> llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll: Tweak to satisfy r199050.
>
> Use intel syntax, or "shl" might hit "pushl".
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll?rev=199051&r1=199050&r2=199051&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shl_undef.ll Sun Jan 12 08:41:41 2014
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -; RUN: llc < %s -O1 -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin | FileCheck %s
> +; RUN: llc < %s -O1 -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin -x86-asm-syntax=intel |
> FileCheck %s
>  ;
>  ; Interesting test case where %tmp1220 = xor i32 %tmp862, %tmp592 and
>  ; %tmp1676 = xor i32 %tmp1634, %tmp1530 have zero demanded bits after
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  ; See rdar://9453156 and rdar://9487392.
>  ;
>
> +; Use intel syntax, or "shl" might hit "pushl".
> +
>  ; CHECK-NOT: shl
>  define i32 @foo(i8* %a0, i32* %a2) nounwind {
>  entry:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140112/a425b954/attachment.html>