[llvm] r198389 - Revert "Reverting r193835 due to weirdness with Go..."

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 15:58:21 PST 2014


Should be pretty easy. :)

On Sat Jan 04 2014 at 8:32:33 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:

> On 03 Jan 2014, at 19:26, dblaikie at gmail.com wrote:
> > One caveat is that Eric (& I can't really disagree) would rather like to
> kill off some of the old DWARF support to keep our codebase simple - so if
> there's any way you can upgrade those tools to cope with modern DWARF,
> that'd be really nice.
> >
> > But for the specific issue of stmt_list and sec_offset, so far as I can
> tell this is not reproducible with ToT Clang/LLVM. I get:
> >
> > echo "int main(void) { return 0; }" | clang-tot -gdwarf-2 -S -x c - -o -
> >
> >         .byte   16                      # DW_AT_stmt_list
> >         .byte   6                       # DW_FORM_data4
> >
> > And the code in LLVM looks like it does the right thing here, choosing
> the form based on DWARF version.
>
> Indeed, this was fixed on trunk by Eric Christopher here:
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=195391
>
> Minus all the formatting changes in these files, I think I can backport
> that to my 3.4 release branch... :)
>
> -Dimitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140106/6151fef4/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list