[PATCH] Add warning capabilities in LLVM (backend part), Take 2

Tobias Grosser tobias at grosser.es
Wed Dec 18 12:15:24 PST 2013

On 12/18/2013 06:34 PM, Quentin Colombet wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 06:41 PM, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>>> Hi Tobias,
>>> On Dec 14, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>> I also used this interface to implement the first diagnostic in Polly (r197558).
>> I also saw you started to submit patches to clang. For plugin authors, it would be amazing if a frontend could optionally register a callback that demangels function names. Like this, the plugin default printers could return something sensible.
> Yes, we have to figure out how to do that.

This file seems interesting:


It seems there is a demangler already accessible in modern C++ ABI 
libraries. What about providing a demangling interface that uses the C++ 
itanium demangler as default (if available), falls back to just return 
the function name if no demangler is available and finally allows the 
frontend to provide its own demangler?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list