[PATCH] Add warning capabilities in LLVM (backend part), Take 2

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Wed Dec 11 13:16:00 PST 2013

On 11 December 2013 18:42, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote:
> That said, I think the vectorizer guys are better suited to define the subclass they need, thus it should be fine as a follow-up step.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list