[llvm] r194542 - SelectionDAG: Teach the legalizer to split SETCC if VSELECT needs splitting too.

Juergen Ributzka juergen at apple.com
Tue Nov 19 15:16:08 PST 2013


Hi Tom,

even after disabling my changes I get the following error from your new test case during instruction selection:

LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x7ffc34825a10: i64 = select 0x7ffc34825910, 0x7ffc3480f510, 0x7ffc3480e210 [ORD=26] [ID=49]
  0x7ffc34825910: i1 = setcc 0x7ffc34825810, 0x7ffc34825710, 0x7ffc3480db10 [ORD=25] [ID=45]
    0x7ffc34825810: i32 = extract_vector_elt 0x7ffc34049810, 0x7ffc34049510 [ORD=25] [ID=41]
      0x7ffc34049810: v2i32 = BUILD_VECTOR 0x7ffc34810c10, 0x7ffc3480e610 [ORD=25] [ID=37]
        0x7ffc34810c10: i32 = extract_vector_elt 0x7ffc3480f110, 0x7ffc34049510 [ORD=24] [ID=32]
          0x7ffc3480f110: v4i32,ch = load 0x7ffc33c160d8, 0x7ffc34046910, 0x7ffc34810210<LD16[undef]> [ORD=24] [ID=27]
            0x7ffc34046910: i64 = add 0x7ffc34047310, 0x7ffc3480f410 [ORD=24] [ID=23]
              0x7ffc34047310: i64,ch = CopyFromReg 0x7ffc33c160d8, 0x7ffc34049910 [ORD=24] [ID=21]
                0x7ffc34049910: i64 = Register %vreg0 [ID=1]
              0x7ffc3480f410: i64 = Constant<52> [ID=4]
            0x7ffc34810210: i64 = undef [ID=3]
          0x7ffc34049510: i32 = Constant<0> [ID=5]
        0x7ffc3480e610: i32 = extract_vector_elt 0x7ffc3480f110, 0x7ffc34049a10 [ORD=24] [ID=31]
          0x7ffc3480f110: v4i32,ch = load 0x7ffc33c160d8, 0x7ffc34046910, 0x7ffc34810210<LD16[undef]> [ORD=24] [ID=27]
            0x7ffc34046910: i64 = add 0x7ffc34047310, 0x7ffc3480f410 [ORD=24] [ID=23]
              0x7ffc34047310: i64,ch = CopyFromReg 0x7ffc33c160d8, 0x7ffc34049910 [ORD=24] [ID=21]
                0x7ffc34049910: i64 = Register %vreg0 [ID=1]
              0x7ffc3480f410: i64 = Constant<52> [ID=4]
            0x7ffc34810210: i64 = undef [ID=3]
          0x7ffc34049a10: i32 = Constant<1> [ID=17]
      0x7ffc34049510: i32 = Constant<0> [ID=5]
    0x7ffc34825710: i32 = extract_vector_elt 0x7ffc3480f310, 0x7ffc34049510 [ORD=25] [ID=26]
      0x7ffc3480f310: v2i32 = BUILD_VECTOR 0x7ffc34049510, 0x7ffc34049510 [ORD=25] [ID=22]
        0x7ffc34049510: i32 = Constant<0> [ID=5]
        0x7ffc34049510: i32 = Constant<0> [ID=5]
      0x7ffc34049510: i32 = Constant<0> [ID=5]
  0x7ffc3480f510: i64 = Constant<0> [ID=7]
  0x7ffc3480e210: i64 = Constant<4> [ID=11]
In function: test_select_v4i64

Do you get the same result?

-Juergen

On Nov 18, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juergen Ributzka <juergen at apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> sorry for not coming back to you earlier. I was working on a patch for this problem this weekend, but then I stumbled across another issue that was exposed while working on the patch. The two pending patches for SelectionDAG that I posted to the mailing list are in preparation for fixing this issue. I looked at your second patch and using SplitVecRes_SETCC would fix the problem, but it also splits the SETCC result vector again, instead of using the already split vectors provided by GetSplitVector. GetSplitVector is just a cache of already split vectors for that given operation. I would prefer not to duplicate split vector nodes if they already exist. The issue for your backend is that split never occurred and that is why the assertion is failing. I hope to get this fixed for you soon.
> 
> Cheers,
> Juergen
> 
> On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Juergen,
>> 
>> These two patches fix the crash for me.  The first one is an R600 fix
>> and the second is a fix for illegal SELECT with legal SETCC as its
>> condition.  I'm not so sure patch number 2 is the right way to
>> fix the bug, but it was the most simple fix I could come up with.
>> 
>> -Tom
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:45:11AM -0800, Juergen Ributzka wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> 
>>> I took a quick look yesterday night and I didn’t see a quick fix either. I will look into it today.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Juergen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:57:54AM -0000, Juergen Ributzka wrote:
>>>>> Author: ributzka
>>>>> Date: Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> New Revision: 194542
>>>>> 
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=194542&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> SelectionDAG: Teach the legalizer to split SETCC if VSELECT needs splitting too.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This patch reapplies r193676 with an additional fix for the Hexagon backend. The
>>>>> SystemZ backend has already been fixed by r194148.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
>>>>> is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
>>>>> because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
>>>>> VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
>>>>> Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
>>>>> promoted to the expected vector mask type for the given target. Now the type
>>>>> legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
>>>>> pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Reviewed by Nadav
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Juergen,
>>>> 
>>>> This caused a regression on R600.  I have attached a patch to this email
>>>> with a testcase.  See my comments below.
>>>> 
>>>>> Added:
>>>>>  llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_split.ll
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>  llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>>>>>  llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp
>>>>>  llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h
>>>>>  llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp?rev=194542&r1=194541&r2=194542&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (original)
>>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> @@ -4364,6 +4364,29 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT(SDNode
>>>>>   }
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> +  // Treat SETCC as a vector mask and promote the result type based on the
>>>>> +  // targets expected SETCC result type. This will ensure that SETCC and VSELECT
>>>>> +  // are both split by the type legalizer. This is done to prevent the type
>>>>> +  // legalizer from unrolling SETCC into scalar comparions.
>>>>> +  EVT SelectVT = N->getValueType(0);
>>>>> +  EVT MaskVT = getSetCCResultType(SelectVT);
>>>>> +  assert(MaskVT.isVector() && "Expected a vector type.");
>>>>> +  if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC && N0.getValueType() != MaskVT) {
>>>>> +    SDLoc MaskDL(N0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    // Extend the mask to the desired value type.
>>>>> +    ISD::NodeType ExtendCode =
>>>>> +      TargetLowering::getExtendForContent(TLI.getBooleanContents(true));
>>>>> +    SDValue Mask = DAG.getNode(ExtendCode, MaskDL, MaskVT, N0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    AddToWorkList(Mask.getNode());
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(1);
>>>>> +    SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(2);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    return DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, SelectVT, Mask, LHS, RHS);
>>>>> +  }
>>>>> +
>>>>> return SDValue();
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp?rev=194542&r1=194541&r2=194542&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp (original)
>>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> @@ -492,14 +492,19 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitRes_SELECT(S
>>>>> SDValue Cond = N->getOperand(0);
>>>>> CL = CH = Cond;
>>>>> if (Cond.getValueType().isVector()) {
>>>>> -    assert(Cond.getValueType().getVectorElementType() == MVT::i1 &&
>>>>> -           "Condition legalized before result?");
>>>>> -    unsigned NumElements = Cond.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
>>>>> -    EVT VCondTy = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MVT::i1, NumElements / 2);
>>>>> -    CL = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
>>>>> -                     DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
>>>>> -    CH = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
>>>>> -                     DAG.getConstant(NumElements / 2, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
>>>>> +    if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
>>>>> +      assert(Cond.getValueType() == getSetCCResultType(N->getValueType(0)) &&
>>>>> +             "Condition has not been prepared for split!");
>>>>> +      GetSplitVector(Cond, CL, CH);
>>>> 
>>>> Even with the adjustment to getSetCCResultType in the attached patch,
>>>> when GetSplitVector() is called here, I am getting an assertion failure:
>>>> 
>>>> llc: LegalizeTypes.cpp:828: void llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::GetSplitVector(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SDValue &, llvm::SDValue &): Assertion `Entry.first.getNode() && "Operand isn't split"' failed.
>>>> 
>>>> From what I can tell the problem here is that 'Cond' has a value type
>>>> of v4i32 which is legal on R600, so the operation was not split, and
>>>> therefore there is no entry in the SplitVectors map for it (This is what
>>>> is causing the assertion failure).
>>>> 
>>>> The SELECT in this example has a type of v4i64 which is not a legal type
>>>> on R600, so the problem occurs when a SELECT node has an illegal type,
>>>> but Operand 0 is a SETCC node with a legal type.  I'm not sure the best
>>>> way to fix this issue.  Do you have any suggestions?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tom
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>> +      EVT ETy = Cond.getValueType().getVectorElementType();
>>>>> +      unsigned NumElements = Cond.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
>>>>> +      EVT VCondTy = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), ETy, NumElements / 2);
>>>>> +      CL = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
>>>>> +                       DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
>>>>> +      CH = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
>>>>> +                       DAG.getConstant(NumElements / 2, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), dl, LL.getValueType(), CL, LL, RL);
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h?rev=194542&r1=194541&r2=194542&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h (original)
>>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> @@ -141,8 +141,11 @@ namespace llvm {
>>>>> 
>>>>>   SDValue  LowerVASTART(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>>>   SDValue  LowerConstantPool(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>>> -    virtual EVT getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &, EVT) const {
>>>>> -      return MVT::i1;
>>>>> +    virtual EVT getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &C, EVT VT) const {
>>>>> +      if (!VT.isVector())
>>>>> +        return MVT::i1;
>>>>> +      else
>>>>> +        return EVT::getVectorVT(C, MVT::i1, VT.getVectorNumElements());
>>>>>   }
>>>>> 
>>>>>   virtual bool getPostIndexedAddressParts(SDNode *N, SDNode *Op,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=194542&r1=194541&r2=194542&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
>>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> @@ -1547,7 +1547,16 @@ void X86TargetLowering::resetOperationAc
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> EVT X86TargetLowering::getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &, EVT VT) const {
>>>>> -  if (!VT.isVector()) return MVT::i8;
>>>>> +  if (!VT.isVector())
>>>>> +    return MVT::i8;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  const TargetMachine &TM = getTargetMachine();
>>>>> +  if (!TM.Options.UseSoftFloat && Subtarget->hasAVX512())
>>>>> +    switch(VT.getVectorNumElements()) {
>>>>> +    case  8: return MVT::v8i1;
>>>>> +    case 16: return MVT::v16i1;
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> return VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_split.ll
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_split.ll?rev=194542&view=auto
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_split.ll (added)
>>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_split.ll Tue Nov 12 19:57:54 2013
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>>>>> +; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=corei7 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=SSE4
>>>>> +; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=corei7-avx < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX1
>>>>> +; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=core-avx2 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX2
>>>>> +
>>>>> +define <16 x i16> @split16(<16 x i16> %a, <16 x i16> %b, <16 x i8> %__mask) {
>>>>> +; SSE4-LABEL: split16:
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: ret
>>>>> +; AVX1-LABEL: split16:
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: ret
>>>>> +; AVX2-LABEL: split16:
>>>>> +; AVX2: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX2: ret
>>>>> +  %1 = icmp ult <16 x i16> %a, %b
>>>>> +  %2 = select <16 x i1> %1, <16 x i16> %a, <16 x i16> %b
>>>>> +  ret <16 x i16> %2
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +define <32 x i16> @split32(<32 x i16> %a, <32 x i16> %b, <32 x i8> %__mask) {
>>>>> +; SSE4-LABEL: split32:
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: pminuw
>>>>> +; SSE4: ret
>>>>> +; AVX1-LABEL: split32:
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX1: ret
>>>>> +; AVX2-LABEL: split32:
>>>>> +; AVX2: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX2: vpminuw
>>>>> +; AVX2: ret
>>>>> +  %1 = icmp ult <32 x i16> %a, %b
>>>>> +  %2 = select <32 x i1> %1, <32 x i16> %a, <32 x i16> %b
>>>>> +  ret <32 x i16> %2
>>>>> +}
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>> <0001-R600-Fix-getSetCCResultType-to-handle-new-VSELECT-DA.patch>
>>> 
>> <0001-R600-Fix-getSetCCResultType-to-handle-new-VSELECT-DA.patch><0002-SelectionDAG-Fix-assertion-failure-when-splitting-ve.patch>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list