[llvm] r194459 - Change data structure to memorize computed result in ScalarEvolution

[Wan, Xiaofei]

Got it, it is my mistake, will keep this in mind in future.

Thanks
Wan Xiaofei

From: Chandler Carruth [mailto:chandlerc at google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:06 PM
To: Wan, Xiaofei; Andy Trick
Cc: Commit Messages and Patches for LLVM
Subject: Re: [llvm] r194459 - Change data structure to memorize computed result in ScalarEvolution

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Wan, Xiaofei <xiaofei.wan at intel.com<mailto:xiaofei.wan at intel.com>> wrote:
Sorry, we discussed it privately to get quick response, see emails attached.

Sure.

Andy, in the future if code review is taking place over email, please keep it on the list. It is much healthier for the community and avoids confusion like this.

Wan Xiaofei, when stuff is discussed in person or for whatever reason accidentally ends up off-list, it is useful to add at least a note to the commit log or to the original review thread for other members of the community just so we can have a heads up or summary of the discussion.


Thanks
Wan Xiaofei
From: Chandler Carruth [mailto:chandlerc at google.com<mailto:chandlerc at google.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:56 PM
To: Wan, Xiaofei
Cc: Commit Messages and Patches for LLVM
Subject: Re: [llvm] r194459 - Change data structure to memorize computed result in ScalarEvolution


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Wan Xiaofei <xiaofei.wan at intel.com<mailto:xiaofei.wan at intel.com>> wrote:
Author: xiaofei.wan
Date: Tue Nov 12 03:40:41 2013
New Revision: 194459

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=194459&view=rev
Log:
Change data structure to memorize computed result in ScalarEvolution

Replace std::map with SmallVector to memorize the cached result since SCEV usually belongs to little Loop/BB
Linear scan on SmallVector is faster than std::map.

Code reviewer : Andrew Trick.

Please revert this.

Andy never reviewed this on the mailing list. Hal gave one comment, which you replied to, and no updates to the code review thread have occurred. There was no code review or LGTM. =/ I really like the idea of this patch, but you can't just bypass the code review process like this!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131112/c8a37800/attachment.html>