[PATCH] Added basic testing support for llvm-cov.

[Justin Bogner]

Is this the right patch? It looks the same as the previous one.

On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, Yuchen Wu wrote:

> I think you'll like this one.
>
>
> So it looks like LLVM buildbots don't like unistd.h, understandably.
>
> I've gone back to the specify path approach.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: mail at justinbogner.com <javascript:;>
> > To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:;>
> > CC: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added basic testing support for llvm-cov.
> > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:51:38 -0800
> >
> > Yuchen Wu <yuchenericwu at hotmail.com <javascript:;>> writes:
> >> Updated.
> >>
> >> If this looks okay, I'll commit it after the patch for reading run
> >> counts gets the LGTM, as this depends on it to not fail.
> >
> > LGTM
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:;>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131106/6d550b09/attachment.html>