[llvm] r193874 - Add comments.

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Fri Nov 1 14:46:40 PDT 2013


Thanks for the comments :)

Just noticed that the file has _ rather than - in the file name. I think we
prefer the latter to the former in llvm.

-eric


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:

> Author: mren
> Date: Fri Nov  1 13:06:25 2013
> New Revision: 193874
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=193874&view=rev
> Log:
> Add comments.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke_with_asm_call.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke_with_asm_call.ll
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke_with_asm_call.ll?rev=193874&r1=193873&r2=193874&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke_with_asm_call.ll
> (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke_with_asm_call.ll Fri
> Nov  1 13:06:25 2013
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  ; RUN: opt < %s -inline -S | FileCheck %s
>  target triple = "x86_64-apple-darwin"
>
> +; In inliner, we assume that inline asm does not throw. This testing case
> makes
> +; sure that the inliner does not convert "call asm" to "invoke asm".
>  ; rdar://15317907
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @caller
>  ; Make sure we are generating "call asm" instead of "invoke asm".
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131101/62ea1f29/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list