[PATCH] Rules adjustments in order to build on DragonFly BSD

Robin Hahling robin.hahling at gw-computing.net
Wed Oct 30 23:03:45 PDT 2013


Great. The DragonFly BSD team will be glad to have it into LLVM.

"Rafael EspĂ­ndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>LGTM
>
>On 30 October 2013 14:45, GW <robin.hahling at gw-computing.net> wrote:
>> Oh, sorry, you are right. I probably missed it when I rewrote the
>patch
>> against Trunk.
>>
>> I attached a new version of the patch.
>>
>> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 14.15:49 Rafael EspĂ­ndola wrote:
>>> You only update Path.inc in the spot where it decides to define
>>> getprogpath, but not where it is used.
>>>
>>> On 30 October 2013 11:47, GW <robin.hahling at gw-computing.net> wrote:
>>> > This simple patch set adjusts some rules for DragonFly BSD.
>>> > We have used them at DragonFly to build and use LLVM 3.1 to 3.3
>and would
>>> > be grateful to see them incorporated into LLVM.
>>> >
>>> > The changes are fairly simple and only affect DragonFly BSD.
>Therefore,
>>> > they should be easy to review. There are no cmake changes
>necessary that
>>> > we know of.
>>> >
>>> > Files modified:
>>> > Makefile.rules
>>> > lib/Support/Unix/Path.inc
>>> > tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile
>>> >
>>> > Robin Hahling
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > llvm-commits mailing list
>>> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131031/76975a19/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list