[PATCH] Developer policy amendment re. non-disclosure
dberlin at dberlin.org
Thu Oct 17 10:30:22 PDT 2013
Here is an updated patch, which also takes into account an issue Nadav
kindly pointed out offline.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> How about this wording for patches:
> When submitting patches, please do not add confidentiality or
> non-disclosure notices. These notices conflict
> with the LLVM license, and may result in your contribution being excluded.
> and this for mailing lists:
> Please be aware that all public LLVM mailing lists are public and
> archived, and that notices of confidentially or non-disclosure cannot
> be respected.
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:
>> I am against it. Your email does not match the clause that you want to add to the LLVM docs. In your email you mentioned patches (which is fine), but in your patch you mentioned email clients, etc.
>> On Oct 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:
>>> This patch amends the developer policy to discourage corporate
>>> non-disclosure or confidentiality signatures on patches intended for
>>> review, which would be at odds with the LLVM license.
>>> OK to commit?
>>> the browser experts
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 978 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the llvm-commits