[LLD] Cyclic dependency between ReaderWriter and YAML backend

[Shankar Easwaran]

On 9/2/2013 11:30 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Yes this seems true today, but I agree we're no where near the point that
> it makes sense for consumers to link against the LLD libraries. When we
> want to start supporting it, we will indeed have to design some way to list
> the correct set of libraries. Either with a config command, or by building
> a single shared library (distinct from the current collection of small,
> well factored libraries) that is the "external" interface. Anyways, this is
> a long way away. I just didn't want circularity to creep in within LLD
> itself.
Agree.

Thanks

Shankar Easwaran

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation