[PATCH] Add ALL to FileCheck

Ron Ofir ron.ofir at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 21:25:46 PDT 2013


How about adding a new command line option --check-all-prefixes in addition
to allowing multiple prefixes? That would allow to write tests that check
for the default prefix, tests that check for multiple prefixes and tests
that check everything.
On Aug 14, 2013 5:41 AM, "Matt Arsenault" <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 9:29 , Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 August 2013 17:11, Stephen Lin <swlin at post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>> Exactly, my suggestion is for multiple prefixes only, and not ALL or
>>  any other prefix that is turned on in all cases. Only "CHECK" is
>> grandfathered is as an implicit prefix, and it is only used in the
>> case that no other prefix is provided.
>>
>
> Ok, that makes sense. I think I prefer this way, too.
>
> Matt, do you have any views on this? Anyone else?
>
>
> I think the multiple -check-prefix option makes sense. I'll try doing that
> later today
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130814/a96757b0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list