[PATCH v2] X86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts

Joerg Sonnenberger joerg at britannica.bec.de
Sat Jul 13 10:57:13 PDT 2013


On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:40:09PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> PaX Team wrote:
> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9362
> >
> > and the conclusion was to change the linux (user) side, not llvm.
> 
> I'm not understanding this: what is so special about btr/bts,

Nothing is. As you have been told before, the same kind of situation
exists for pretty much any instruction with memory operand and
immediate.

Joerg



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list