[PATCH] Help? The zext-sext.ll test

[Eric Christopher]

Set a specific processor for the test? Though that means that we're
not going to notice if we break it on (i assume) !Atom, but...

-eric

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Tim Northover <tnorthover at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Having made a couple of botched attempts to fix this test I thought I'd see what people actually know about it.
>>
>> Basically, it seems that scheduling means that the exact sequence being checked for may not occur depending on the host CPU. It *looks* like the test isn't trying to check that so the attached patch just fixes it at one which works at the moment.
>>
>> Does anyone have any better suggestions or other ideas?
>
> Can you disable scheduling completely / use source-order scheduling?
>
> /jakob
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits