[patch] Make r600 non-experimental

[David Blaikie]

If this means we'll release R600 in 3.4, do we have adequate test
coverage/buildbots?


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> The r600 backend has been in tree for some time now. It has tests that
> are being maintained and there is even a buildbot that builds it.
>
> We should probably stop calling it experimental. This should make sure
> that we don't accidentally break the build.
>
> Is the attached patch OK?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130521/b3226edd/attachment.html>