[PATCH] docs: Clarify how basic blocks without named label are handled.

[Sean Silva]

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:49:39 -0600
> Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>
> []
> > > > Describe that basic blocks without named labels are assigned
> > > > numbered label using the same counter as for unnamed temporaries.
> > > >
> > > > Based on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16043 and llvm-dev
> > > > discussion.
> > >
> > > LGTM.
> > >
> > >
> > Cool.
> >
> > Paul, do you need me to commit this for you?
>
> Sure, I'd appreciate that.
>

Landed in r182332.

While the behavior itself is no less confusing now, it is at least
documented, so you can probably close that bug report. If you want to
pursue changing how we print the iR, then that probably will deserve its
own bug report (and more discussion (probably on the mailing list) about
how to go about it).

-- Sean Silva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130520/44811da8/attachment.html>