Support unaligned load/store on more ARM targets

[Renato Golin]

On 16 May 2013 00:21, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:

> Even more, the change in question actually is a regression for such
> subtargets. Previously the code generated never trapped and the
> present one traps. And starting to ask for additional cmdline flag is
> a bad thing here IMO.
>

I have to agree with Anton, here. The results of unaligned access is a trap
and code will fail, independent of the default on power on, boot code will
set whatever they want and code bare metal code expecting aligned access
will trap.

Let's be conservative in general and make Linux more performing.

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130516/52ca452e/attachment.html>