[www] r181240 - Adding questionnaire results

[Renato Golin]

Author: rengolin
Date: Mon May  6 14:41:23 2013
New Revision: 181240

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=181240&view=rev
Log:
Adding questionnaire results

Modified:
    www/trunk/devmtg/2013-04/index.html

Modified: www/trunk/devmtg/2013-04/index.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/devmtg/2013-04/index.html?rev=181240&r1=181239&r2=181240&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- www/trunk/devmtg/2013-04/index.html (original)
+++ www/trunk/devmtg/2013-04/index.html Mon May  6 14:41:23 2013
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
         <li><a href="#announcements">Announcement</a></li>
         <!-- <li><a href="#callfor">Call for Speakers, Posters, Demos</a></li> -->
         <li><a href="#content">Content</a></li>
+        <li><a href="#questionnaire">Questionnaire Results</a></li>
         <li><a href="#talkabstract">Talk abstracts</a></li>
         <li><a href="#tutoabstract">Tutorial abstracts</a></li>
         <li><a href="#posterabstract">Poster abstracts</a></li>
@@ -321,6 +322,98 @@ need by way of abstract and introduction
 </table>
 
 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<h2 id="questionnaire">Questionnaire Results</h2>
+<p>
+At the end of the event we had 91 questionnaires returned and the
+results were pretty good. Below are some overall results, but each
+presenter will receive the results of their own talks by personal email.
+</p>
+<p>
+Each question had a range of four possible results (excellent-poor,
+very usefull-waste of time, etc), and below are the percentage of the
+results that were 1 or 2 (excellent+good, very useful+useful, etc).
+We're not considering "average" as a positive result, for obvious reasons.
+</p>
+<p>
+At the end, there's a table with the percentages of a geometric mean of
+all talks and another for the lightning talks, so you can get a feel of
+the response without going in too much detail.
+</p>
+
+<p><b>Overall event questions</b></p>
+
+<table border=1>
+<tr><th>Question</th><th>% of positive results</th></tr>
+<tr><td>Overall event</td><td>98%</td></tr>
+<tr><td> </td><td> </td></tr>
+<tr><td>Venue Quality</td><td>96%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Venue Food & Drinks</td><td>77%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Venue Rooms & Equipment</td><td>73%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Venue Location</td><td>99%</td></tr>
+<tr><td> </td><td> </td></tr>
+<tr><td>Quality of Lectures/Papers</td><td>100%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Quality of Tutorials</td><td>93%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Lightning Talks & Posters</td><td>94%</td></tr>
+<tr><td> </td><td> </td></tr>
+<tr><td>Overall networking usefulness</td><td>94%%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Created 5+ new connections</td><td>65%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Reinforced 5+ existing connections</td><td>44%</td></tr>
+<tr><td> </td><td> </td></tr>
+<tr><td>Dinner Cruis Overall</td><td>100%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Dinner Cruise Food & Drinks</td><td>100%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Dinner Cruise Location</td><td>100%</td></tr>
+<tr><td> </td><td> </td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p><b>Regarding the Content, they wanted:</b></p>
+
+<table border=1>
+<tr><th>Topic</th><th>More</th><th>Same</th><th>Less</th></tr>
+<tr><td>Formal Presentations</td><td>19%</td><td>67%</td><td>14%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Deeper, Specific Sessions</td><td>42%</td><td>39%</td><td>19%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Technical (Soft. Eng.) Sessions</td><td>43%</td><td>48%</td><td>9%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Narrowing Towards a Major Theme</td><td>4%</td><td>81%</td><td>15%</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p><b>Location and Transport</b></p>
+
+<p>Where should we hold EuroLLVM 2014?</p>
+<ul>
+  <li><b>Paris</b> 18%</li>
+  <li><b>London</b> 16%</li>
+  <li><b>Any Major EU city</b> 66%</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p><b>Geometric Mean of All Talks</b></p>
+
+<table border=1>
+<tr><th>Question</th><th>% of positive results</th></tr>
+<tr><td>Material clearly cresented</td><td>86%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Interesting topic to me</td><td>84%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Too much knowledge required(*)</td><td>78%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Important to the Community</td><td>90%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Would like to hear more</td><td>84%</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>
+(*) Positive results for this question are those that answered
+"disagree" and "strongly disagree", since we except that the talks
+didn't required too much detailed knowledge to understand, specially
+from a crowd as specialized as ours.
+<p>
+
+<p><b>Lightning Talks</b></p>
+
+<table border=1>
+<tr><th>Question</th><th>% of positive results</th></tr>
+<tr><td>Material clearly cresented</td><td>90%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Interesting topic to me</td><td>93%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Too much knowledge required(*)</td><td>93%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Important to the Community</td><td>94%</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Would like to hear more</td><td>90%</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
 <h2 id="talkabstract">Talk abstracts</h2>
 <p>
 <b><a id="talk1">Dagger: decompilation to LLVM IR