[llvm] r177584 - Remove trailing spaces.
Jakub Staszak
kubastaszak at gmail.com
Wed Mar 20 14:47:51 PDT 2013
Author: kuba
Date: Wed Mar 20 16:47:51 2013
New Revision: 177584
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=177584&view=rev
Log:
Remove trailing spaces.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp?rev=177584&r1=177583&r2=177584&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp Wed Mar 20 16:47:51 2013
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements an analysis that determines, for a given memory
-// operation, what preceding memory operations it depends on. It builds on
+// operation, what preceding memory operations it depends on. It builds on
// alias analysis information, and tries to provide a lazy, caching interface to
// a common kind of alias information query.
//
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ STATISTIC(NumCacheCompleteNonLocalPtr,
static const int BlockScanLimit = 500;
char MemoryDependenceAnalysis::ID = 0;
-
+
// Register this pass...
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(MemoryDependenceAnalysis, "memdep",
"Memory Dependence Analysis", false, true)
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ bool MemoryDependenceAnalysis::runOnFunc
/// RemoveFromReverseMap - This is a helper function that removes Val from
/// 'Inst's set in ReverseMap. If the set becomes empty, remove Inst's entry.
template <typename KeyTy>
-static void RemoveFromReverseMap(DenseMap<Instruction*,
+static void RemoveFromReverseMap(DenseMap<Instruction*,
SmallPtrSet<KeyTy, 4> > &ReverseMap,
Instruction *Inst, KeyTy Val) {
typename DenseMap<Instruction*, SmallPtrSet<KeyTy, 4> >::iterator
@@ -196,13 +196,13 @@ getCallSiteDependencyFrom(CallSite CS, b
// Walk backwards through the block, looking for dependencies
while (ScanIt != BB->begin()) {
// Limit the amount of scanning we do so we don't end up with quadratic
- // running time on extreme testcases.
+ // running time on extreme testcases.
--Limit;
if (!Limit)
return MemDepResult::getUnknown();
Instruction *Inst = --ScanIt;
-
+
// If this inst is a memory op, get the pointer it accessed
AliasAnalysis::Location Loc;
AliasAnalysis::ModRefResult MR = GetLocation(Inst, Loc, AA);
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ getCallSiteDependencyFrom(CallSite CS, b
///
/// MemLocBase, MemLocOffset are lazily computed here the first time the
/// base/offs of memloc is needed.
-static bool
+static bool
isLoadLoadClobberIfExtendedToFullWidth(const AliasAnalysis::Location &MemLoc,
const Value *&MemLocBase,
int64_t &MemLocOffs,
@@ -289,25 +289,25 @@ getLoadLoadClobberFullWidthSize(const Va
if (LI->getParent()->getParent()->getAttributes().
hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Attribute::SanitizeThread))
return 0;
-
+
// Get the base of this load.
int64_t LIOffs = 0;
- const Value *LIBase =
+ const Value *LIBase =
GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(LI->getPointerOperand(), LIOffs, &TD);
-
+
// If the two pointers are not based on the same pointer, we can't tell that
// they are related.
if (LIBase != MemLocBase) return 0;
-
+
// Okay, the two values are based on the same pointer, but returned as
// no-alias. This happens when we have things like two byte loads at "P+1"
// and "P+3". Check to see if increasing the size of the "LI" load up to its
// alignment (or the largest native integer type) will allow us to load all
// the bits required by MemLoc.
-
+
// If MemLoc is before LI, then no widening of LI will help us out.
if (MemLocOffs < LIOffs) return 0;
-
+
// Get the alignment of the load in bytes. We assume that it is safe to load
// any legal integer up to this size without a problem. For example, if we're
// looking at an i8 load on x86-32 that is known 1024 byte aligned, we can
@@ -316,15 +316,15 @@ getLoadLoadClobberFullWidthSize(const Va
unsigned LoadAlign = LI->getAlignment();
int64_t MemLocEnd = MemLocOffs+MemLocSize;
-
+
// If no amount of rounding up will let MemLoc fit into LI, then bail out.
if (LIOffs+LoadAlign < MemLocEnd) return 0;
-
+
// This is the size of the load to try. Start with the next larger power of
// two.
unsigned NewLoadByteSize = LI->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits()/8U;
NewLoadByteSize = NextPowerOf2(NewLoadByteSize);
-
+
while (1) {
// If this load size is bigger than our known alignment or would not fit
// into a native integer register, then we fail.
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ getLoadLoadClobberFullWidthSize(const Va
// If a load of this width would include all of MemLoc, then we succeed.
if (LIOffs+NewLoadByteSize >= MemLocEnd)
return NewLoadByteSize;
-
+
NewLoadByteSize <<= 1;
}
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ getLoadLoadClobberFullWidthSize(const Va
/// instruction as well; this function may take advantage of the metadata
/// annotated to the query instruction to refine the result.
MemDepResult MemoryDependenceAnalysis::
-getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnalysis::Location &MemLoc, bool isLoad,
+getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnalysis::Location &MemLoc, bool isLoad,
BasicBlock::iterator ScanIt, BasicBlock *BB,
Instruction *QueryInst) {
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
// Debug intrinsics don't (and can't) cause dependences.
if (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(II)) continue;
-
+
// If we reach a lifetime begin or end marker, then the query ends here
// because the value is undefined.
if (II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::lifetime_start) {
@@ -406,10 +406,10 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
return MemDepResult::getClobber(LI);
AliasAnalysis::Location LoadLoc = AA->getLocation(LI);
-
+
// If we found a pointer, check if it could be the same as our pointer.
AliasAnalysis::AliasResult R = AA->alias(LoadLoc, MemLoc);
-
+
if (isLoad) {
if (R == AliasAnalysis::NoAlias) {
// If this is an over-aligned integer load (for example,
@@ -423,10 +423,10 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
isLoadLoadClobberIfExtendedToFullWidth(MemLoc, MemLocBase,
MemLocOffset, LI, TD))
return MemDepResult::getClobber(Inst);
-
+
continue;
}
-
+
// Must aliased loads are defs of each other.
if (R == AliasAnalysis::MustAlias)
return MemDepResult::getDef(Inst);
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
if (R == AliasAnalysis::PartialAlias)
return MemDepResult::getClobber(Inst);
#endif
-
+
// Random may-alias loads don't depend on each other without a
// dependence.
continue;
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
// Stores depend on may/must aliased loads.
return MemDepResult::getDef(Inst);
}
-
+
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {
// Atomic stores have complications involved.
// FIXME: This is overly conservative.
@@ -474,10 +474,10 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
// Ok, this store might clobber the query pointer. Check to see if it is
// a must alias: in this case, we want to return this as a def.
AliasAnalysis::Location StoreLoc = AA->getLocation(SI);
-
+
// If we found a pointer, check if it could be the same as our pointer.
AliasAnalysis::AliasResult R = AA->alias(StoreLoc, MemLoc);
-
+
if (R == AliasAnalysis::NoAlias)
continue;
if (R == AliasAnalysis::MustAlias)
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI = AA->getTargetLibraryInfo();
if (isa<AllocaInst>(Inst) || isNoAliasFn(Inst, TLI)) {
const Value *AccessPtr = GetUnderlyingObject(MemLoc.Ptr, TD);
-
+
if (AccessPtr == Inst || AA->isMustAlias(Inst, AccessPtr))
return MemDepResult::getDef(Inst);
// Be conservative if the accessed pointer may alias the allocation.
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
return MemDepResult::getClobber(Inst);
}
}
-
+
// No dependence found. If this is the entry block of the function, it is
// unknown, otherwise it is non-local.
if (BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock())
@@ -544,25 +544,25 @@ getPointerDependencyFrom(const AliasAnal
/// depends.
MemDepResult MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getDependency(Instruction *QueryInst) {
Instruction *ScanPos = QueryInst;
-
+
// Check for a cached result
MemDepResult &LocalCache = LocalDeps[QueryInst];
-
+
// If the cached entry is non-dirty, just return it. Note that this depends
// on MemDepResult's default constructing to 'dirty'.
if (!LocalCache.isDirty())
return LocalCache;
-
+
// Otherwise, if we have a dirty entry, we know we can start the scan at that
// instruction, which may save us some work.
if (Instruction *Inst = LocalCache.getInst()) {
ScanPos = Inst;
-
+
RemoveFromReverseMap(ReverseLocalDeps, Inst, QueryInst);
}
-
+
BasicBlock *QueryParent = QueryInst->getParent();
-
+
// Do the scan.
if (BasicBlock::iterator(QueryInst) == QueryParent->begin()) {
// No dependence found. If this is the entry block of the function, it is
@@ -591,11 +591,11 @@ MemDepResult MemoryDependenceAnalysis::g
// Non-memory instruction.
LocalCache = MemDepResult::getUnknown();
}
-
+
// Remember the result!
if (Instruction *I = LocalCache.getInst())
ReverseLocalDeps[I].insert(QueryInst);
-
+
return LocalCache;
}
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
/// the uncached case, this starts out as the set of predecessors we care
/// about.
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 32> DirtyBlocks;
-
+
if (!Cache.empty()) {
// Okay, we have a cache entry. If we know it is not dirty, just return it
// with no computation.
@@ -644,17 +644,17 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
++NumCacheNonLocal;
return Cache;
}
-
+
// If we already have a partially computed set of results, scan them to
// determine what is dirty, seeding our initial DirtyBlocks worklist.
for (NonLocalDepInfo::iterator I = Cache.begin(), E = Cache.end();
I != E; ++I)
if (I->getResult().isDirty())
DirtyBlocks.push_back(I->getBB());
-
+
// Sort the cache so that we can do fast binary search lookups below.
std::sort(Cache.begin(), Cache.end());
-
+
++NumCacheDirtyNonLocal;
//cerr << "CACHED CASE: " << DirtyBlocks.size() << " dirty: "
// << Cache.size() << " cached: " << *QueryInst;
@@ -665,45 +665,45 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
DirtyBlocks.push_back(*PI);
++NumUncacheNonLocal;
}
-
+
// isReadonlyCall - If this is a read-only call, we can be more aggressive.
bool isReadonlyCall = AA->onlyReadsMemory(QueryCS);
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 64> Visited;
-
+
unsigned NumSortedEntries = Cache.size();
DEBUG(AssertSorted(Cache));
-
+
// Iterate while we still have blocks to update.
while (!DirtyBlocks.empty()) {
BasicBlock *DirtyBB = DirtyBlocks.back();
DirtyBlocks.pop_back();
-
+
// Already processed this block?
if (!Visited.insert(DirtyBB))
continue;
-
+
// Do a binary search to see if we already have an entry for this block in
// the cache set. If so, find it.
DEBUG(AssertSorted(Cache, NumSortedEntries));
- NonLocalDepInfo::iterator Entry =
+ NonLocalDepInfo::iterator Entry =
std::upper_bound(Cache.begin(), Cache.begin()+NumSortedEntries,
NonLocalDepEntry(DirtyBB));
if (Entry != Cache.begin() && prior(Entry)->getBB() == DirtyBB)
--Entry;
-
+
NonLocalDepEntry *ExistingResult = 0;
- if (Entry != Cache.begin()+NumSortedEntries &&
+ if (Entry != Cache.begin()+NumSortedEntries &&
Entry->getBB() == DirtyBB) {
// If we already have an entry, and if it isn't already dirty, the block
// is done.
if (!Entry->getResult().isDirty())
continue;
-
+
// Otherwise, remember this slot so we can update the value.
ExistingResult = &*Entry;
}
-
+
// If the dirty entry has a pointer, start scanning from it so we don't have
// to rescan the entire block.
BasicBlock::iterator ScanPos = DirtyBB->end();
@@ -715,10 +715,10 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
QueryCS.getInstruction());
}
}
-
+
// Find out if this block has a local dependency for QueryInst.
MemDepResult Dep;
-
+
if (ScanPos != DirtyBB->begin()) {
Dep = getCallSiteDependencyFrom(QueryCS, isReadonlyCall,ScanPos, DirtyBB);
} else if (DirtyBB != &DirtyBB->getParent()->getEntryBlock()) {
@@ -728,14 +728,14 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
} else {
Dep = MemDepResult::getNonFuncLocal();
}
-
+
// If we had a dirty entry for the block, update it. Otherwise, just add
// a new entry.
if (ExistingResult)
ExistingResult->setResult(Dep);
else
Cache.push_back(NonLocalDepEntry(DirtyBB, Dep));
-
+
// If the block has a dependency (i.e. it isn't completely transparent to
// the value), remember the association!
if (!Dep.isNonLocal()) {
@@ -744,14 +744,14 @@ MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalCal
if (Instruction *Inst = Dep.getInst())
ReverseNonLocalDeps[Inst].insert(QueryCS.getInstruction());
} else {
-
+
// If the block *is* completely transparent to the load, we need to check
// the predecessors of this block. Add them to our worklist.
for (BasicBlock **PI = PredCache->GetPreds(DirtyBB); *PI; ++PI)
DirtyBlocks.push_back(*PI);
}
}
-
+
return Cache;
}
@@ -769,9 +769,9 @@ getNonLocalPointerDependency(const Alias
assert(Loc.Ptr->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
"Can't get pointer deps of a non-pointer!");
Result.clear();
-
+
PHITransAddr Address(const_cast<Value *>(Loc.Ptr), TD);
-
+
// This is the set of blocks we've inspected, and the pointer we consider in
// each block. Because of critical edges, we currently bail out if querying
// a block with multiple different pointers. This can happen during PHI
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ MemDepResult MemoryDependenceAnalysis::
GetNonLocalInfoForBlock(const AliasAnalysis::Location &Loc,
bool isLoad, BasicBlock *BB,
NonLocalDepInfo *Cache, unsigned NumSortedEntries) {
-
+
// Do a binary search to see if we already have an entry for this block in
// the cache set. If so, find it.
NonLocalDepInfo::iterator Entry =
@@ -802,18 +802,18 @@ GetNonLocalInfoForBlock(const AliasAnaly
NonLocalDepEntry(BB));
if (Entry != Cache->begin() && (Entry-1)->getBB() == BB)
--Entry;
-
+
NonLocalDepEntry *ExistingResult = 0;
if (Entry != Cache->begin()+NumSortedEntries && Entry->getBB() == BB)
ExistingResult = &*Entry;
-
+
// If we have a cached entry, and it is non-dirty, use it as the value for
// this dependency.
if (ExistingResult && !ExistingResult->getResult().isDirty()) {
++NumCacheNonLocalPtr;
return ExistingResult->getResult();
- }
-
+ }
+
// Otherwise, we have to scan for the value. If we have a dirty cache
// entry, start scanning from its position, otherwise we scan from the end
// of the block.
@@ -823,30 +823,30 @@ GetNonLocalInfoForBlock(const AliasAnaly
"Instruction invalidated?");
++NumCacheDirtyNonLocalPtr;
ScanPos = ExistingResult->getResult().getInst();
-
+
// Eliminating the dirty entry from 'Cache', so update the reverse info.
ValueIsLoadPair CacheKey(Loc.Ptr, isLoad);
RemoveFromReverseMap(ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps, ScanPos, CacheKey);
} else {
++NumUncacheNonLocalPtr;
}
-
+
// Scan the block for the dependency.
MemDepResult Dep = getPointerDependencyFrom(Loc, isLoad, ScanPos, BB);
-
+
// If we had a dirty entry for the block, update it. Otherwise, just add
// a new entry.
if (ExistingResult)
ExistingResult->setResult(Dep);
else
Cache->push_back(NonLocalDepEntry(BB, Dep));
-
+
// If the block has a dependency (i.e. it isn't completely transparent to
// the value), remember the reverse association because we just added it
// to Cache!
if (!Dep.isDef() && !Dep.isClobber())
return Dep;
-
+
// Keep the ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps map up to date so we can efficiently
// update MemDep when we remove instructions.
Instruction *Inst = Dep.getInst();
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ GetNonLocalInfoForBlock(const AliasAnaly
/// SortNonLocalDepInfoCache - Sort the a NonLocalDepInfo cache, given a certain
/// number of elements in the array that are already properly ordered. This is
/// optimized for the case when only a few entries are added.
-static void
+static void
SortNonLocalDepInfoCache(MemoryDependenceAnalysis::NonLocalDepInfo &Cache,
unsigned NumSortedEntries) {
switch (Cache.size() - NumSortedEntries) {
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
SmallVectorImpl<NonLocalDepResult> &Result,
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> &Visited,
bool SkipFirstBlock) {
-
+
// Look up the cached info for Pointer.
ValueIsLoadPair CacheKey(Pointer.getAddr(), isLoad);
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// Get the NLPI for CacheKey, inserting one into the map if it doesn't
// already have one.
- std::pair<CachedNonLocalPointerInfo::iterator, bool> Pair =
+ std::pair<CachedNonLocalPointerInfo::iterator, bool> Pair =
NonLocalPointerDeps.insert(std::make_pair(CacheKey, InitialNLPI));
NonLocalPointerInfo *CacheInfo = &Pair.first->second;
@@ -987,14 +987,14 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>::iterator VI = Visited.find(I->getBB());
if (VI == Visited.end() || VI->second == Pointer.getAddr())
continue;
-
+
// We have a pointer mismatch in a block. Just return clobber, saying
// that something was clobbered in this result. We could also do a
// non-fully cached query, but there is little point in doing this.
return true;
}
}
-
+
Value *Addr = Pointer.getAddr();
for (NonLocalDepInfo::iterator I = Cache->begin(), E = Cache->end();
I != E; ++I) {
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
++NumCacheCompleteNonLocalPtr;
return false;
}
-
+
// Otherwise, either this is a new block, a block with an invalid cache
// pointer or one that we're about to invalidate by putting more info into it
// than its valid cache info. If empty, the result will be valid cache info,
@@ -1014,10 +1014,10 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
CacheInfo->Pair = BBSkipFirstBlockPair(StartBB, SkipFirstBlock);
else
CacheInfo->Pair = BBSkipFirstBlockPair();
-
+
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 32> Worklist;
Worklist.push_back(StartBB);
-
+
// PredList used inside loop.
SmallVector<std::pair<BasicBlock*, PHITransAddr>, 16> PredList;
@@ -1028,10 +1028,10 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// revisit blocks after we insert info for them.
unsigned NumSortedEntries = Cache->size();
DEBUG(AssertSorted(*Cache));
-
+
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
BasicBlock *BB = Worklist.pop_back_val();
-
+
// Skip the first block if we have it.
if (!SkipFirstBlock) {
// Analyze the dependency of *Pointer in FromBB. See if we already have
@@ -1043,14 +1043,14 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
DEBUG(AssertSorted(*Cache, NumSortedEntries));
MemDepResult Dep = GetNonLocalInfoForBlock(Loc, isLoad, BB, Cache,
NumSortedEntries);
-
+
// If we got a Def or Clobber, add this to the list of results.
if (!Dep.isNonLocal() && DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB)) {
Result.push_back(NonLocalDepResult(BB, Dep, Pointer.getAddr()));
continue;
}
}
-
+
// If 'Pointer' is an instruction defined in this block, then we need to do
// phi translation to change it into a value live in the predecessor block.
// If not, we just add the predecessors to the worklist and scan them with
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
NewBlocks.push_back(*PI);
continue;
}
-
+
// If we have seen this block before, but it was with a different
// pointer then we have a phi translation failure and we have to treat
// this as a clobber.
@@ -1082,12 +1082,12 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
Worklist.append(NewBlocks.begin(), NewBlocks.end());
continue;
}
-
+
// We do need to do phi translation, if we know ahead of time we can't phi
// translate this value, don't even try.
if (!Pointer.IsPotentiallyPHITranslatable())
goto PredTranslationFailure;
-
+
// We may have added values to the cache list before this PHI translation.
// If so, we haven't done anything to ensure that the cache remains sorted.
// Sort it now (if needed) so that recursive invocations of
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
PredPointer.PHITranslateValue(BB, Pred, 0);
Value *PredPtrVal = PredPointer.getAddr();
-
+
// Check to see if we have already visited this pred block with another
// pointer. If so, we can't do this lookup. This failure can occur
// with PHI translation when a critical edge exists and the PHI node in
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// the analysis and can ignore it.
if (InsertRes.first->second == PredPtrVal)
continue;
-
+
// Otherwise, the block was previously analyzed with a different
// pointer. We can't represent the result of this case, so we just
// treat this as a phi translation failure.
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// Actually process results here; this need to be a separate loop to avoid
// calling getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB for blocks we don't want to return
- // any results for. (getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB will modify our
+ // any results for. (getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB will modify our
// datastructures in ways the code after the PredTranslationFailure label
// doesn't expect.)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < PredList.size(); i++) {
@@ -1186,12 +1186,12 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
continue;
}
}
-
+
// Refresh the CacheInfo/Cache pointer so that it isn't invalidated.
CacheInfo = &NonLocalPointerDeps[CacheKey];
Cache = &CacheInfo->NonLocalDeps;
NumSortedEntries = Cache->size();
-
+
// Since we did phi translation, the "Cache" set won't contain all of the
// results for the query. This is ok (we can still use it to accelerate
// specific block queries) but we can't do the fastpath "return all
@@ -1204,20 +1204,20 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// The following code is "failure"; we can't produce a sane translation
// for the given block. It assumes that we haven't modified any of
// our datastructures while processing the current block.
-
+
if (Cache == 0) {
// Refresh the CacheInfo/Cache pointer if it got invalidated.
CacheInfo = &NonLocalPointerDeps[CacheKey];
Cache = &CacheInfo->NonLocalDeps;
NumSortedEntries = Cache->size();
}
-
+
// Since we failed phi translation, the "Cache" set won't contain all of the
// results for the query. This is ok (we can still use it to accelerate
// specific block queries) but we can't do the fastpath "return all
// results from the set". Clear out the indicator for this.
CacheInfo->Pair = BBSkipFirstBlockPair();
-
+
// If *nothing* works, mark the pointer as unknown.
//
// If this is the magic first block, return this as a clobber of the whole
@@ -1225,12 +1225,12 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
// we have to bail out.
if (SkipFirstBlock)
return true;
-
+
for (NonLocalDepInfo::reverse_iterator I = Cache->rbegin(); ; ++I) {
assert(I != Cache->rend() && "Didn't find current block??");
if (I->getBB() != BB)
continue;
-
+
assert(I->getResult().isNonLocal() &&
"Should only be here with transparent block");
I->setResult(MemDepResult::getUnknown());
@@ -1250,23 +1250,23 @@ getNonLocalPointerDepFromBB(const PHITra
/// CachedNonLocalPointerInfo, remove it.
void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::
RemoveCachedNonLocalPointerDependencies(ValueIsLoadPair P) {
- CachedNonLocalPointerInfo::iterator It =
+ CachedNonLocalPointerInfo::iterator It =
NonLocalPointerDeps.find(P);
if (It == NonLocalPointerDeps.end()) return;
-
+
// Remove all of the entries in the BB->val map. This involves removing
// instructions from the reverse map.
NonLocalDepInfo &PInfo = It->second.NonLocalDeps;
-
+
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PInfo.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Instruction *Target = PInfo[i].getResult().getInst();
if (Target == 0) continue; // Ignore non-local dep results.
assert(Target->getParent() == PInfo[i].getBB());
-
+
// Eliminating the dirty entry from 'Cache', so update the reverse info.
RemoveFromReverseMap(ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps, Target, P);
}
-
+
// Remove P from NonLocalPointerDeps (which deletes NonLocalDepInfo).
NonLocalPointerDeps.erase(It);
}
@@ -1321,20 +1321,20 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::removeIns
// Remove this local dependency info.
LocalDeps.erase(LocalDepEntry);
}
-
+
// If we have any cached pointer dependencies on this instruction, remove
// them. If the instruction has non-pointer type, then it can't be a pointer
// base.
-
+
// Remove it from both the load info and the store info. The instruction
// can't be in either of these maps if it is non-pointer.
if (RemInst->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
RemoveCachedNonLocalPointerDependencies(ValueIsLoadPair(RemInst, false));
RemoveCachedNonLocalPointerDependencies(ValueIsLoadPair(RemInst, true));
}
-
+
// Loop over all of the things that depend on the instruction we're removing.
- //
+ //
SmallVector<std::pair<Instruction*, Instruction*>, 8> ReverseDepsToAdd;
// If we find RemInst as a clobber or Def in any of the maps for other values,
@@ -1346,29 +1346,29 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::removeIns
MemDepResult NewDirtyVal;
if (!RemInst->isTerminator())
NewDirtyVal = MemDepResult::getDirty(++BasicBlock::iterator(RemInst));
-
+
ReverseDepMapType::iterator ReverseDepIt = ReverseLocalDeps.find(RemInst);
if (ReverseDepIt != ReverseLocalDeps.end()) {
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> &ReverseDeps = ReverseDepIt->second;
// RemInst can't be the terminator if it has local stuff depending on it.
assert(!ReverseDeps.empty() && !isa<TerminatorInst>(RemInst) &&
"Nothing can locally depend on a terminator");
-
+
for (SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4>::iterator I = ReverseDeps.begin(),
E = ReverseDeps.end(); I != E; ++I) {
Instruction *InstDependingOnRemInst = *I;
assert(InstDependingOnRemInst != RemInst &&
"Already removed our local dep info");
-
+
LocalDeps[InstDependingOnRemInst] = NewDirtyVal;
-
+
// Make sure to remember that new things depend on NewDepInst.
assert(NewDirtyVal.getInst() && "There is no way something else can have "
"a local dep on this if it is a terminator!");
- ReverseDepsToAdd.push_back(std::make_pair(NewDirtyVal.getInst(),
+ ReverseDepsToAdd.push_back(std::make_pair(NewDirtyVal.getInst(),
InstDependingOnRemInst));
}
-
+
ReverseLocalDeps.erase(ReverseDepIt);
// Add new reverse deps after scanning the set, to avoid invalidating the
@@ -1379,25 +1379,25 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::removeIns
ReverseDepsToAdd.pop_back();
}
}
-
+
ReverseDepIt = ReverseNonLocalDeps.find(RemInst);
if (ReverseDepIt != ReverseNonLocalDeps.end()) {
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> &Set = ReverseDepIt->second;
for (SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4>::iterator I = Set.begin(), E = Set.end();
I != E; ++I) {
assert(*I != RemInst && "Already removed NonLocalDep info for RemInst");
-
+
PerInstNLInfo &INLD = NonLocalDeps[*I];
// The information is now dirty!
INLD.second = true;
-
- for (NonLocalDepInfo::iterator DI = INLD.first.begin(),
+
+ for (NonLocalDepInfo::iterator DI = INLD.first.begin(),
DE = INLD.first.end(); DI != DE; ++DI) {
if (DI->getResult().getInst() != RemInst) continue;
-
+
// Convert to a dirty entry for the subsequent instruction.
DI->setResult(NewDirtyVal);
-
+
if (Instruction *NextI = NewDirtyVal.getInst())
ReverseDepsToAdd.push_back(std::make_pair(NextI, *I));
}
@@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::removeIns
ReverseDepsToAdd.pop_back();
}
}
-
+
// If the instruction is in ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps then it appears as a
// value in the NonLocalPointerDeps info.
ReverseNonLocalPtrDepTy::iterator ReversePtrDepIt =
@@ -1420,45 +1420,45 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::removeIns
if (ReversePtrDepIt != ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps.end()) {
SmallPtrSet<ValueIsLoadPair, 4> &Set = ReversePtrDepIt->second;
SmallVector<std::pair<Instruction*, ValueIsLoadPair>,8> ReversePtrDepsToAdd;
-
+
for (SmallPtrSet<ValueIsLoadPair, 4>::iterator I = Set.begin(),
E = Set.end(); I != E; ++I) {
ValueIsLoadPair P = *I;
assert(P.getPointer() != RemInst &&
"Already removed NonLocalPointerDeps info for RemInst");
-
+
NonLocalDepInfo &NLPDI = NonLocalPointerDeps[P].NonLocalDeps;
-
+
// The cache is not valid for any specific block anymore.
NonLocalPointerDeps[P].Pair = BBSkipFirstBlockPair();
-
+
// Update any entries for RemInst to use the instruction after it.
for (NonLocalDepInfo::iterator DI = NLPDI.begin(), DE = NLPDI.end();
DI != DE; ++DI) {
if (DI->getResult().getInst() != RemInst) continue;
-
+
// Convert to a dirty entry for the subsequent instruction.
DI->setResult(NewDirtyVal);
-
+
if (Instruction *NewDirtyInst = NewDirtyVal.getInst())
ReversePtrDepsToAdd.push_back(std::make_pair(NewDirtyInst, P));
}
-
+
// Re-sort the NonLocalDepInfo. Changing the dirty entry to its
// subsequent value may invalidate the sortedness.
std::sort(NLPDI.begin(), NLPDI.end());
}
-
+
ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps.erase(ReversePtrDepIt);
-
+
while (!ReversePtrDepsToAdd.empty()) {
ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps[ReversePtrDepsToAdd.back().first]
.insert(ReversePtrDepsToAdd.back().second);
ReversePtrDepsToAdd.pop_back();
}
}
-
-
+
+
assert(!NonLocalDeps.count(RemInst) && "RemInst got reinserted?");
AA->deleteValue(RemInst);
DEBUG(verifyRemoved(RemInst));
@@ -1472,7 +1472,7 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::verifyRem
assert(I->second.getInst() != D &&
"Inst occurs in data structures");
}
-
+
for (CachedNonLocalPointerInfo::const_iterator I =NonLocalPointerDeps.begin(),
E = NonLocalPointerDeps.end(); I != E; ++I) {
assert(I->first.getPointer() != D && "Inst occurs in NLPD map key");
@@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::verifyRem
II != E; ++II)
assert(II->getResult().getInst() != D && "Inst occurs as NLPD value");
}
-
+
for (NonLocalDepMapType::const_iterator I = NonLocalDeps.begin(),
E = NonLocalDeps.end(); I != E; ++I) {
assert(I->first != D && "Inst occurs in data structures");
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::verifyRem
EE = INLD.first.end(); II != EE; ++II)
assert(II->getResult().getInst() != D && "Inst occurs in data structures");
}
-
+
for (ReverseDepMapType::const_iterator I = ReverseLocalDeps.begin(),
E = ReverseLocalDeps.end(); I != E; ++I) {
assert(I->first != D && "Inst occurs in data structures");
@@ -1498,7 +1498,7 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::verifyRem
EE = I->second.end(); II != EE; ++II)
assert(*II != D && "Inst occurs in data structures");
}
-
+
for (ReverseDepMapType::const_iterator I = ReverseNonLocalDeps.begin(),
E = ReverseNonLocalDeps.end();
I != E; ++I) {
@@ -1507,17 +1507,17 @@ void MemoryDependenceAnalysis::verifyRem
EE = I->second.end(); II != EE; ++II)
assert(*II != D && "Inst occurs in data structures");
}
-
+
for (ReverseNonLocalPtrDepTy::const_iterator
I = ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps.begin(),
E = ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps.end(); I != E; ++I) {
assert(I->first != D && "Inst occurs in rev NLPD map");
-
+
for (SmallPtrSet<ValueIsLoadPair, 4>::const_iterator II = I->second.begin(),
E = I->second.end(); II != E; ++II)
assert(*II != ValueIsLoadPair(D, false) &&
*II != ValueIsLoadPair(D, true) &&
"Inst occurs in ReverseNonLocalPtrDeps map");
}
-
+
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list