[PATCH] Simplify the logic in getX86SubSuperRegister

[Eli Bendersky]

Ping

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> getX86SubSuperRegister has a special mode with High=true for i64 which
> exists solely to enable it to call itself for i8 with some registers.
> The proposed patch simplifies the function somewhat to make the High
> bit only meaningful for the i8 mode, which makes sense. No functional
> difference (getX86SubSuperRegister is not getting called from anywhere
> outside with i64 and High=true).
>
> If this looks OK, I'll also add a comment that documents
> getX86SubSuperRegister propertly.
>
> Eli