[llvm-commits] [PATCH] [lld] Use CLI/Target entrypoint instead of default "_start" in WriterOptionsELF

Michael Spencer bigcheesegs at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 17:15:57 PST 2013


On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ahmed Bougacha
<ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Ahmed Bougacha
>> <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Ahmed Bougacha
>>>> <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Shankar Easwaran
>>>>> <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>> I am working on a patch where the options are going to be defined in the
>>>>>> target. There would be a TargetInfo class which would define all the needed
>>>>>> options which WriterELFOptions / ReaderELFOptions would contain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is an updated version of the entrypoint patch, made much shorter
>>>>> by your work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -- Ahmed Bougacha
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shankar Easwaran
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/17/2013 8:43 AM, Ahmed Bougacha wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Michael, Nick, all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was toying with lld when I noticed command-line and target-defined
>>>>>> entrypoints are never used, with the entrypoint always defaulting to
>>>>>> _start. With the small attached patch it works as expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When writing a testcase, I also noticed lld-core doesn't accept a
>>>>>> --entry= argument, so I added it too. For now, this is only used by
>>>>>> WriterOptionsELF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As to other writers, how about making WriterOptionsELF a WriterOptions
>>>>>> and adding the entrypoint there for all Writers to use? If no one is
>>>>>> working on it and it's ok I can take care of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Ahmed Bougacha
>>>>
>>>> The patch looks good, but the tests need some fixing.
>>>>
>>>> You don't need to put entrypoint in the Inputs folder. That's only for
>>>> test inputs that can't fit in a file that lit works with. Such as
>>>> binary files. The test itself should contain that content. See the
>>>> other objtxt tests.
>>>
>>> Right, fixed.
>>>
>>>> Also, the test should use the lld -core interface.
>>>
>>> It does run lld-core, or maybe you are talking about something else?
>>>
>>>> And wrap lines at 80 col, even in tests.
>>>>
>>>> - Michael Spencer
>>>
>>> -- Ahmed Bougacha
>>
>> See elf/ifunc.test for an example of lld -core. I just realized that
>> lld -core currently doesn't work with YAML files, so the patch is
>> actually fine as is. Do you have commit access?
>
> Nope
>
>> - Michael Spencer
>
> -- Ahmed Bougacha

This makes darwin/hello-world.objtxt fail. Build check-lld.

- Michael Spencer



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list