[llvm-commits] Revised: [PATCH] Provide the capability of defining CLANG_VENDOR via configure or cmake.

[Chandler Carruth]

Ron, please post this patch back on the review thread where you got
feedback from Duncan and lets finish discussing it there.

I'll try to actually write my thoughts there, but I still don't see the
need for or benefit of this patch.... But forking the discussion into a new
thread makes it really hard to have a useful discussion and keep everyone
on the same page.


On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ron Lieberman <ronl at codeaurora.org> wrote:

> This is a revised patch incorporating the new spelling****
>
>    llvm-vendor****
>
> ** **
>
> [PATCH] Provide the capability of defining CLANG_VENDOR via****
>
> configure or cmake.****
>
> ** **
>
> Default for the new configure option:****
>
>   --with-llvm-vendor defaults to null.****
>
> ** **
>
> The vendor name is configured using the following option****
>
>   --with-llvm-vendor="INTLWICKET " \****
>
> ** **
>
> Examples:****
>
> ** **
>
> $ clang -v****
>
> INTLWICKET clang version 3.2  (based on LLVM 3.2svn)****
>
> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu****
>
> Thread model: posix****
>
> ** **
>
> The __VERSION__ macro becomes:****
>
> define __VERSION__ "4.2.1 Compatible INTLWICKET Clang 3.2 "****
>
> ** **
>
> Testing:****
>
> cmake****
>
> cmake -DLLVM_VENDOR=****
>
> cmake -DLLVM_VENDOR="INTLWICKET "****
>
> ** **
>
> configure****
>
> configure --with-llvm-vendor=****
>
> configure --with-llvm-vendor="INTLWICKET "****
>
> ** **
>
> ---****
>
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by The Linux Foundation****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120909/ff9f35b2/attachment.html>